Talk:Frontal assault
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can someone verify the 48% casualty fact that was in here before? Did 48% of all American combat casualties actually occur in the Civil War? -Prometheus
- Good call. I added it because it was in the original stub, but it doesn't look true according to some websites.
- --cprompt
- Oh, wait. Actually, it's 4.8%. That's still a lot, but I don't think it is so significant it needs to be in the article. I have no objections if anyone else adds it, feeling otherwise. Source: http://www.geobop.com/World/NA/Topics/History/Civil_War/reference/compare/
- --cprompt
(An old discussion, I know.) 48% was wrong, but not that far off. Checking against the numbers at Remember.gov and our own United States casualties of war, both reveal 34%. If you use the KIAs (instead of the "total deaths"), its more like 28%. Only World War II was worse in terms of American casualties. --Mrwojo 02:15, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Tactical vs Operational Levels
[edit]Right now there is no distinction made in the article. Centurion216 (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Frontal assault page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Frontal assault" page.