Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

9 September 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 08	September 10 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Edie Rodriguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable business woman. Article has been an orphan for 7 years, sources are all trade press puff. Golikom (talk) 10:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Uttar Pradesh train derailment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, title is ambiguous as there are other (albeit non notable) derailment incidents in the state, including a recent one just hours ago. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:BRANCH. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 10:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matej Rehák

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehák played a total of 19 minutes at professional level before being sent to lower leagues, then disappeared. The only secondary source I found is SME but it's paywalled. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Connections

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still believe this fails SIGCOV and notability for the same reasons discussed in the last AfD discussion two months ago. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Monument Mythos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail notability guidelines. Most of the article’s sources are student newspapers by the author’s own description. Could not find reliable significant coverage in my search. Has been previously deleted. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kashif Aslam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable makeup artist. This was created after the deletion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashee's Beauty Salon by the same user. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CalDigit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for companies. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Technology. StewdioMACK (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Checking in Google News, there are hundreds (20 pages of links) of independent appearances in media. Still, it's true they are mostly reviews of their products, not talking about the company itself. The company consumer products have been pretty popular, but maybe that fame is not enough. Tbh I'm not sure. Janeender (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raihan Merchant

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tamgha-e-Imtiaz is a minor (4th grade) award, according to our article. There is no direct or in-depth coverage about him. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'4th grade' makes it sounds like it isn't a real award at all, whereas it definitely is and only conferred upon high-achievers. It is the 'medal of excellence' after all. Raihan Merchant is actually a super influential figure in Pakistan media and advertising. Sharan Shias (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ACM Gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex broker. Coverage is mostly paid/PR-based. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irfan Pardesi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable forex trader. Lacks unpaid independent in-depth secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 09:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Kule

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

8 games in Albania’s highest league, continued in the semi-pro second tier, did get 4 more games on the top level. With sources not being better than this, this or this, I don't think it meets WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. What do you think? Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bogor. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 12:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Bogor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Previously merged and redirected to the city of Bogor; absolutely no need to fragment this content. Reverted, so we are here. The material has already been merged, so no need to merge. No objection to a redirect. // Timothy :: talk 11:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article just isn't necessary - all the article text and most of the content of the infobox is copied from Bogor. The only thing not present in that article is the Blazon (formal description) of the coat of arms but that's less that fifty words long and could be added to the city's article if it was thought necessary. Neiltonks (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete. Mccapra (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or delete. Not notable as it's own article. AlexandraAVX (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Coat of arms of Bogor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the redirected section, no sections appear in the Bogor article. So for me it's better to just delete it, because if you redirect it, nothing will appear in that article Baqotun0023 (talk) 07:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhi (2023 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently 123telugu was declared unreliable by the Indian cinema taskforce. Given that Indiaglitz is also considered unreliable, there are no reliable reviews (had there been at least 1, I would have let this slide). There was a FilmyFocus review on the page but that is also likely non notable (all unreliable sources can't be listed there). Given that the fact that the longest source is an interview from 123telugu, this film has no notability.

The TV9 Telugu source is a small snippet only mentioned that Vishwak Sen was invited for the film's launch while the NTV source mentions where the film is streaming. All in all, the only notable reliable source is the NTV source [1], which isn't enough to keep an entire Wikipedia article of a 2023 film. This isn't even a pre Internet film.

P. S. I had tried my best to improve the film's sourcing to no avail. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have no comment on this. Either delete, or redirect to List of Telugu films of 2023. My main aim to create this article was to add more entries to Vidhi, but this also does the job. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadush Danaj

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are profile and no significant coverages. Xegma(talk) 07:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Albania. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PGC 2387685

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant or non-trivial coverage in media or studies, not in a catalogue of note, not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. SkyFlubbler (talk) 15:18, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the interacting companion galaxy, SDSS J161330.18+510335.5, has at least one paper published.[2] Praemonitus (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helge Rasche

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FOOTYN as he never played nor coached at top level. Coverage is only of his death, which does not automatically establish notability. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Football, and Germany. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 06:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly does not pass WP:FOOTYN as a player, while his coaching achievement (not managership) consists solely of an Under-19 role and nothing in a senior capacity. I detect some kind of personal sympathy voting as an inspiration for the creation and expansion of this article. Ref ^(chew)(do) 07:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very unclear whether this group of "lower communities" which includes e.g. Sat-Sudra (considered higher castes), is a commonly accepted grouping with a clear definition, or some division created specifically for this article. Also not clear if the topic (Sanskrit texts by caste division) is a topic of study and whether these people are grouped together scholarly, or if this is some novel WP:SYNTH list. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Language, Hinduism, and India. Fram (talk) 08:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article of Sat-Sudra is very badly written. I have suggested an edit but my edit is reverted. Please check. Sat-shoodras are only higher than other shudras (asat shudras) and lower than every other varna. That is, Lower than Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaishya. See the note on sat-shoodra there. Caste boundaries can't be clearly defined due to their complexities. The main castes are mentioned themselves which are considered lower nonetheless. Sat-shoodra only highlights their status in varna system. This is a dynamic list and more people from other communities can be added by everyone. The topic of debate has always been whether lower communities have contributed to sanskrit among scholars. This article helps in breaking the myths of denial of education and lack of scholarship among lower communities and foster inclusivity. Mohit Dokania (talk) 09:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NLIST and WP:RS. Almost 60 % of the sources are unreliable. Andhraportal, wisdomlib, jainqq.org, sanskritkosha,sndp, sanskritdocuments etc., are not RS. A list topic is considered notable if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent, reliable sources, which I find none here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All references to Wisdomlib, Jainqq.org and sanskritkosha are of published books available on those sources. Which are both reliable and accurate. All the information provided are as accurate as possible. You can challenge any misinformation in talk page. This has always been the matter of debate among scholars to assess the contribution of lower communuties in Sanskrit literature. See this. Mohit Dokania (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tanha Dar Mazrae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources (a.k.a. no wiki links) and no reliable reviews. This may fail Wikipedia:Notability (films). This article about a short film is short because no other sources exist.

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayeye Penhan. I am also nominating the following related page because it is also is sourced by a similar website (akhbarrasmi, is it notable?):

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no participation so far.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinch to Punch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This lacks WP:SIGCOV even the article knows it limited information has surfaced online. Oricon yield no result, Natalie yield no result, even the Japanese article has one source, the only thing I could find that is RS is from the Media Arts Database Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Anime and manga and Japan. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this related articles with the same reason as above

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Keep) and improve with sources from the Japanese WP, that has a lot considering it's a 1969-1970 series! -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Education, and Transportation. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(My initial !vote above is about Zen-chan Tsū-chan). I hadn't seen this was a bundled nom when I !voted through the assisted script. Procedural keep. These series have very little in common. And it's hard to discuss and improve the 3 at the same time without long tedious explanations and comments about what precisely is relevant to each case. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) (The nominator indicates they nominated the pages "with the same reason" but the 2nd article has >10 references to reliable newspapers on JaWP, for example.)[reply]
I'll just seperate the 2nd one. Thanks for pointing out Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mention of ’the 2nd article’ is unclear: for the record, I mean Zen-chan Tsū-chan. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 22:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects to the respective networks should also be considered.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see some way to keep the content, and suggest a merge to Fuji Television. For the ones which are made by Fuji, which doesn't include Zen-chan (please, please, don't do combined nominations of disparate articles!). Not sure about Zen-chan, as like @Mushy Yank this came up as a single article for me and I hadn't given it any thought before starting this comment
On Pinch to Punch it's unfortunate that there is so little secondary material out there although it seems even the primary material has been lost. This attests to its importance in the context of the development of Anime. This article could be perfectly happy as a stub, verified by what little information is out there, but it's hard to make a case for IAR on this. Oblivy (talk) 07:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with developing these articles would be our inability to access archives which would have information about an anime series from 50 years ago. Hard to imagine that Pinch and Punch, a series with 156 episodes airing on a national TV channel, wouldn't be notable with access to the correct archives. If someone is interested, perhaps Fuji or the National Film Archive of Japan can help? I would personally either keep or merge the articles at a minimum. DCsansei (talk) 07:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is no consensus here. But I don't see any support for Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perak railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTRAINSTATION. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Stations, Transportation, and Pakistan. cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rohri–Chaman Line or List of railway stations in Pakistan. Easy to resume the work this way - if someone curious like me finds offline coverage in future. Gheus (talk) 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

North American Grappling Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and NCORP for not having signification coverage from independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 06:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Corporation Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tafsir-e-Zakaria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverages and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Islam. Shellwood (talk) 08:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No indication of significance. scope_creep^Talk 06:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Single ref is effectively WP:OR. scope_creep^Talk 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barren Earth (DC Comics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any reliable source talking about it so it clearly fails WP:GNG. The article only cites 1 sources which they repeated twice Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Drama Series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's hard to decide if I will draftify this article but this feels like it's too soon to have the a standalone article. The award and the 1st edition of the award itself is notable but this specific category as of now, seems no notable. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating this article for the same reason:

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Awards, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: as a WP:SPLITLIST or redirect to the main page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gotham Awards#Gotham TV Awards for now; assuming that the next ceremony includes these categories, these lists would no longer copy information from a single article and could be recreated then. I would also support redirecting Gotham TV Award for Outstanding Performance in a Comedy Series for the same reasons. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Evening News (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never charted and fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Roasted (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Full of unsourced, original research and does not demonstrate notability. cyberdog958^Talk 07:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom 🌀Typ hoon Ampil ^Tools 10:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James L. Enos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear indication of notability. Being the first president of the National Teachers Association isn't enough. No significant coverage in cited sources. Before search found nothing significant. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Iowa. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Peace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. The book seems to notable but not the individual. Note tag placed on it. Coverage is all for the book. scope_creep^Talk 04:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and New Jersey. Shellwood (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Communal Studies Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No relevance. Article without notoriety and without independent or reliable sources. Alon9393 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional and fails NCORP. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NCORP. Xegma(talk) 05:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2028 Northern Territory general election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Article only has one source, and it does not say anything about the election in 2028. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Australia. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Thought about a redirect but I really couldn't find a suitable target. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cañapa Lake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one source, not enough to meet the general notability guideline. And the source does not have the lake as its primary topic and hence is not SIGCOV. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Bolivia. Stanley Joseph Wilkins (talk) 04:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WSJP-LD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV, Fox affiliation notwithstanding. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Puerto Rico. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Fox affiliates. No sources, no article and all but the Fox affiliation does bring in an argument they should become one with the Fox affiliation list articles. --Danubeball (talk) 02:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a Merge suggestion but you must provide a link to the preferred target article. Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda (engine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a rocket engine under development which has no proven notability as it does not yet exist. Clear case of WP:TOOSOON. As part of WP:NPP it was draftified for improvement, for instance waiting until it has proven to be viable. Novice editor removed tags, moved back to main and made comments that violate politeness code. This article and approach is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Since the editor has rejected draftification, deletion now is the approach. If the motor ever works and becomes useful, then and only then would it be appropriate for Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Spaceflight. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N.B., this page used to be a redirect to a short description in the Firefly Aerospace page. Within that page it can be OK; however creating a new article by replacing a redirect must pass the same bar as the creation of any new page. Ldm1954 (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lean keep Unlike a lot of these fledgling companies, that end up promising a lot of vaporware, this case is likely different. This engine has the backing of Northrop Grumman, which needs it to power its Antares rocket, which it needs to lift the Cygnus spacecraft into space to resupply the International Space Station per the terms of its Commercial Resupply Services contract witch NASA. So there’s a lot riding on this program, which all adds to its notability. Furthermore, if this engine program fails, that itself may be notable if it ends the entire Antares rocket program. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While you make interesting points, I think keeping the article would also contradict Wikipedia:NOTACRYSTALBALL (I.e. Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not) since the engine is still a prototype. Let's see other opinions. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and try this at BE-4 or Raptor pages first as a precedent... KroOoOze (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That’s a poor comparison as the BE-4 and Raptor have both flown and this engine has not. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On test\certification flights. Raptor 3 have not flown at all. In either case we rely on official informations from the companies, and things like Isp is fundamentally impossible to independently verify, and we cannot be sure with what specs they will ultimately end up with (and that is ok). Invoking CRYSTALBALL is frivolous and agaist the spirit\intention of the guideline. KroOoOze (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: but fine. What about New Glenn or Artemis II articles? By this twisted logic, should they be deleted? KroOoOze (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, however I’ll point out that this engine has completed several hot fire tests, that were shared by Northrop Grumman. So in my opinion, it’s not entirely correct to point to WP:CRYSTALBALL. This isn’t just a product announcement or rumors when they actually have a working product and a deadline to deliver that’s just months away at this point. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has many problems, but reference information being readily available ain't one of them. With consideration to how this frivolous demand was brought up, I suggest to summarily dismiss this and not waste any more of anyone's time. Whether this is inlined and put under another pointless redirection is a distinction without difference to normal people. So if anyone wants to waste his time doing this, whatever. But don't deny access to the users in the process by (soft or hard) deleting it.

|

The engine was test-fired, so it has more than sufficient physicality. People expect to find all this basic information here. I don't think there is precedent, and purging all development engines from Wikipedia is, on the face of it, bizzare idea. The template itself has a state available for whether the engine is in development or in any other stage; i.e. it is normal and expected there would be articles about engines in development.

|

The petitioner out of the blue tried to draftify the article, with complete disregard for any links to it. He tried do draftify it despite it existing more than 90 days (years in fact). Now it is clear the motivation was as a prelude to deletion. In this discussion several frivolous reasons for deletion are thrown around simply trying to see what sticks, while concern over what actually most benefits the users is not considered. Any large rocket engine is very much "notable" to people in the field as well as fans, regardless whether currently in development or not. One could claim Too_soon with maybe some concept that will be renamed two more times and doesn't have anything but the name in the first place, but hardly this engine at this stage. KroOoOze (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not provide incorrect information. As I clarified, the earlier page was a {{redirect}}. If it was a real page then it was not eligible for draftification. However, it was a new page and as such goes through the standard Wikipedia:New pages patrol process.

Please note the Wikipedia:Five pillars "Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility" Ldm1954 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Firefly Aerospace per WP:NSUSTAINED, WP:FUTURE, WP:PAGEDECIDE, WP:NOTPROMO, etc etc. While a few reliable sources have briefly covered the testing of this engine, it fails WP:GNG - there is not yet enough detailed coverage to warrant a standalone article. I think this is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. This engine may well become independently notable in the future, but currently, there simply is not enough coverage to provide all but the most basic information on it. Until further SIGCOV appears, this seems better handled as a subsection of the Firefly Aerospace article. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 03:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have arguments to Delete, Merge and one editor Leaning Keep so there is no consensus here yet. We determine notability on Wikipedia not based on editors' opinions but by coverage by reliable, secondary independent sources. Could anyone provide a further source assessment?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis: There are 5 sources. 1, 2, 5 are all web articles by the manufacturer, so are not independent and (IMO) weak. Both sources 3 & 4 are from specialized science web news sites, and mainly repeat statements by the two companies, so are also weak on independence; there are no comments from independent experts. They are not from, for instance, a major national or international newspaper, and there is no comment from NASA, JPL etc experts. I do not consider that the current article has any reliable, secondary and independent sources. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the source listed in the article currently, I found the following:

Two press releases[3][4]
A paywalled article in Aviation Week [5], a reputable publication
A few short articles on niche aerospace news websites[6][7][8] of unclear reliability/independence, and one particularly shameful article[9] that just reads like an ad

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 06:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While SpaceNews isn’t a household name, Jeff Faust has become quite respected among the small cadre of full-time space journalists. He’s also probably the only one with a PhD from MIT. I’d argue he’s a reliable source.

While I don’t recognize the name of the journalist from Space.com, the site does have the green check of approval as a reliable source for Wikipedia.

-- RickyCourtney (talk) 06:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E-Z Moving

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:A7. Local company that does not meet WP:GNG and listed sources read like WP:SPONSORED. cyberdog958^Talk 06:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of South Korea, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article based on primary sources, fails WP:ORG LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, South Korea, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched in the Korean language and none of what I read passes the threshold of notability. These are the closest I could find: [10][11] seefooddiet (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Taggart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. He was a member of the town board of a town with a population of 862. Grahaml35 (talk) 02:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Population of a town should not be a factor. He deserves notoriety for being the youngest politician in Colorado history. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wiki there is basis to keep the article as it does meet standards as I created the article with enough legitimate citations showing he received tens of thousands of votes, spoke on live television and radio and holds a record in politics. @Grahaml35 @CAPTAIN RAJU. I want to make sure there is no political bias in this decision process. Bobsmithian (talk) 06:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Poland, Dublin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since December 2020. The only sources provided is its own website. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Ireland, and Poland. LibStar (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of significant coverages and fails WP:NORG. Xegma(talk) 05:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Ireland–Poland_relations#Resident_diplomatic_missions. As WP:ATD-R. While the building/office/institution likely has no independent notability, there is some value (and certainly nothing inappropriate) about retaining the title. As a redirect to the article in which the topic/subject is covered. Guliolopez (talk) 09:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Shevchuk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i can see it's need more sources. Xegma(talk) 05:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge High School, New Zealand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any sigcov. Can be redirect to Cambridge, New Zealand#Education Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - If you click on any of the links on this nomination template: "Find sources: "Cambridge High School, New Zealand" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR", a whole lot of sourcing comes up to help verify Cambridge High School, New Zealand. — Maile (talk) 02:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And which of those sources are reliable, secondary, and in depth? Traumnovelle (talk) 04:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, an unnotable school lacking in sigcov. Esolo5002 (talk) 04:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 05:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Yemin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yemin's name gets mentioned a lot in punk zines, but as far as I'm aware, none of those are considered reliable, and he's not mentioned frequently enough outside of them to pass notability. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Digital USD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stablecoin. Fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 01:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Mancini

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography fails WP:GNG as it lacks WP:SUSTAINED direct and in-depth coverage. Gheus (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. models.com is WP:USERGENERATED. Polygnotus (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You'd think an Italian supermodel would have an article on it-WP. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah:[12][13] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
good morning everyone, can I ask you why you are deleting the page of a model who made the history of Italian fashion with one of the greatest stylists in the world? instead of deleting the article wouldn't it be better to complete it and put it in order? I study at the Marangoni University of Fashion, and Fabio Mancini is for us Italians one of the major points of reference for Italian men's fashion in the world. I think that a well-curated entry is the best solution instead of deleting it @CAPTAIN RAJU@Polygnotus@Gheus 109.52.120.95 (talk) 06:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:GNG. What are the 3 best sources you can think of that are at the same time reliably published (WP:RS), independent of the subject and about the subject in some detail? Non-English sources can be used. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A couple of better-than-passing-mention hits on ProQuest:[14][15]. This [16] also mentions him, but can't access it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that the latter 2 are The Daily Telegraph (Sydney)/The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney), may not be WP:BLP-good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something:[17][18], same text in both. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chimele Usuwa Abengowe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, the content on ref 1 which is a magazine can't be verified by any reliable source same as ref 5. Ref 2 and ref 5 are also the same link on the article current state. The only source here was this which just only talk about his death. Ref 7 which is a YouTube video showcasing a church service cant be use as a source neither any YouTube link can be use as a source. Ref 3 which just only mentioned his name as part of the medical list and not like he was talked about. Subject just totally fails WP:GNG. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Nigeria. Gabriel (……?) 01:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly a much respected citizen but WP:NOTMEMORIAL Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
thank you for your response. Please note that @Gabriel601 has been trolling my articles and marking them for deletion. There's an established case of "nominations in bad faith here". Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

welcome again for marking another article of mine for deletion. After the last episode, you should have recused yourself from my articles and leave other editors to go through and arrive at their own conclusions. Cfaso2000 (talk) 05:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Schad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable sources. COI history doesn't help either. Gheus (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment: From the article: "Brenda and Jeannine McCann co-founded the company Tribe of Two". So all those references are primary sources, too. _signed,Willondon (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Japan, France, Italy, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Ghazali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG for not having significant coverage from independent, reliable source for verification. One Champion is not reliable and indepdent source as this is the combat promotion company where the subject is under contract. www.iloveborneo, www.iluminasi and https://www.sportskeeda all are not reliable sources. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Malaysia. Cassiopeia talk 00:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete need more significant coverages and also "Personal life" section is unsourced. Xegma(talk) 04:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crabtree Brewing Co.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. The first source is a blog. 2nd is not sigcov and third is very local coverage as per WP:AUD. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Colorado. LibStar (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV and unsourced sections. Xegma(talk) 05:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skagit Environmental Endowment Commission

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP for not having significant coverage of independent, reliable sources for verification. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airnav.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't seem to find any WP:SIGCOV and there is no clear reason why this is a notable website. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article itself has no reference. I cannot find any sources talk about it, only WP:PASSINGMENTIONS Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It is very heavily cited (see Google books, Google scholar). There is a page of coverage here and a paragraph of coverage here. I imagine there is more so I suggest participants take a good look at Google books for significant coverage. C F A 💬 02:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a fixed Google books link. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, while CFA didn't cast a "vote" in this discussion, they have brought sources to the discussion which should be reviewed. Soft deletion doesn't seem appropriate as deletion is no longer "uncontroversial".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There's hardly more than a passing mention to be found (who runs it? etc), but wow, the quantity of mentions in articles, journals, and websites is - in this case - informative. tedder (talk) 01:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presbyterian Church in Korea (BoSuHapDong III.)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A follow-up to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korea Jesus Presbyterian Church with a single page nominated rather than a bundle.

Bosu Hapdong (Korean: 보수합동) translates as "Conservative Union". The only source is a database of Church denominations, which "did not manage to contact this church". This is insufficient sourcing to keep this as an article.

Furthermore, the title is mangled with an unnecessary . character, and the Roman Numeral may be an invention of reformiert-online. Korean Wikipedia does not have an article on this; a cursory search in Korean did not find an immediate result for (or about) any group of this name.

For a potential redirect, it is unclear what the target would be: Presbyterian Church of Korea, Presbyterianism in South Korea, or a new page. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and South Korea. Walsh90210 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Presbyterianism in South Korea. seefooddiet (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bandial railway station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no claim to notability, and no sources. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Stations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and no sources. Xegma(talk) 05:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of railway stations in Pakistan for now. Colonial era station, likely notable. Someone with access to local library may find good amount of coverage. Gheus (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Morse

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate and state government official. Page previously created and deleted back in 2018 (though that was before her state government service). Of the 24 sources cited on the page: 5 are WP:ROTM coverage of her campaigns, 3 are press releases, 6 are articles about wildfires that quotes her a few times, 3 only mention her in passing, 2 are pages on government websites, 2 are recordings of state legislative committee hearings, 1 doesn't even mention her at all, and only 3 are actual in-depth interviews or profiles with local outlets. Someone is not inherently notable just because they ran for Congress and held a relatively minor position in state government, and the coverage I'm seeing here doesn't convince me that she meets GNG. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You're right that running by itself does not make one notable. However, she's still notable for her work regarding wildfires which came after the page was deleted originally, and as I see it she definitely meets GNG. First there's this Sacramento Bee story, which despite being "local" as you say, is still 27th largest paper in the U.S., so it's not exactly a small town paper. This is also, though local, still notable enough to help with GNG I think. Then of course there's this profile which is not local at all. There are also things like this, which while they aren't profiles, are more than just passing mentions or quotes, and treat her as notable. If that wasn't enough though I've found a few other things as well via a quick Google search: this 2022 interview on KQED (second half turns into an interview of her background and life after talking about wildfires), this is a Dailykos profile, which although about the election still goes into detail about her; and finally here is another Sac Bee story, this one on her getting the Deputy Secretary job. There's more, but I think with the things I've already mentioned she safely passes GNG. Relinus (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is not her first run for office, and most likely will not be her last. What makes her notable, are her variety of services both with California and on a national level. — Maile (talk) 03:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nisar Safdar Khan Jadoon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a member of the Provincial Assembly has nothing to do with being Notable especially when theres zero significant coverage of the subject neither sources to proof notability. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. Gabriel (……?) 00:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of WP:SIGCOV. Xegma(talk) 04:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian American Women Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Isn't a notable organization. jwtmsqeh (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There appears to be sources for this organization including the LA Times, Santa Monica Daily Press, an interview with a local radio station, and a doctoral dissertation. I'll add them to the article a bit later tonight or tomorrow, just wanted to put them here for anyone else to evaluate etc. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Santa Monica Daily Press seems like a press release? The LA Times is actually a localized sub paper, not sure if that or the local radio is considered since Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) specifies that articles "solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability". Also, the article is about an event but the same guideline says "an organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it". Happy to withdraw this if I'm misreading though. jwtmsqeh (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support As per the wiki notability principle I don't think this article fulfil the minimal criteria prior to Subject Consideration possible reason fair enough भारतसरकार-विभाग (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]