Talk:Three-component theory of stratification
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Three-component theory of stratification be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
IMO this division is pretty arbitrary and depends on the particular historical period. Why "economical relationship" is the touchstone? Why not religion? Say, what's wrong with the following two-component stratification?
- religious class.
- status class, based on other criteria, other than religion.
IMO it will work pretty well in ancient Egypt.
And party class is so naive a notion. Why not sports fan class? Mikkalai 09:21, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Cleanup tag
[edit]I have tagged this article for cleanup because it needs to be rewritten primarily using our own words, rather than relying so heavily on direct quotes. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 19:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Examples listed for forms of wealth
[edit]These are all tangible assets, it is intangible property that most differentiates those who are rich/wealthy and those who are not (stocks/bonds, dividends, private pensions, funds that incentivise long term deposit of the means of exchange,) especially when considering the privileged tax status that this form of property holds (i.e. they attract little.) Thus this should be changed.
81.147.40.55 (talk) 22:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Multiple policy violations, essay not encyclopedia article
[edit]This is an original research essay, not an encyclopedia article.
It violates multiple wiki policies.
The t lede 1st sentence does not define the subject.
The lede 1st paragraph does not summarize the body.
Nothing is sourced properly.
Almost no sentence is supported by sources. MBUSHIstory (talk) 08:40, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Three-component theory of stratification page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Three-component theory of stratification" page.
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class Anthropology articles
- Mid-importance Anthropology articles
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Start-Class socialism articles
- Low-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Wikipedia requested images