Talk:Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
[edit]
The material on this page was published (with some modifications for NPOV) with the permission of the author, Dr. Abraham Lavender. But feel free to edit it as necessary to conform with the requirements of Wikipedia! -- BD2412 thimk 04:28, 2005 May 4 (UTC)
Old Sephardic Sites
[edit]There are other Sephardic Jewish community sites from the old Internet (late 90s, early 2000s) that were shared in the HaLapid's issues. I will include them here for historical/research references as they include links to research articles, websites from past SCJS presidents, and affiliate sites to SCJS that are no longer available without Wayback Machine.
- Personal website of former SCJS President Benveniste
- Links to other Sephardic Jewish community sites
- Old site of the American Sephardi Federation
- Sephardim website
Morogris (✉ • ✎) 06:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 12:11, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- ... that the Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies held their first meeting in a US military fort?
- Source: "Stanley M. Hordes, Joshua Stampfer and Rena Downs found the Society
Morogris (✉ • ✎) 15:15, 4 October 2024 (UTC).
- Will review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough: - ?
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article was about 2,500 bytes pre-expansion. In order to qualify through 5x expansion, that would mean that it needs to be about 12,500 bytes post-expansion. From my count, it looks like its about 5,000 currently, well short of the requirement unfortunately. Am I missing something? BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- I mistakenly believed that a fully unsourced article would qualify for DYK if it was later cited and expanded. Since the article had been unsourced for almost 20 years, I decided to work on it. I'm not sure why I thought this was a rule, perhaps it was an old one? I can't seem to find any current guidelines supporting this, so it looks like the article isn’t suitable for DYK after all. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 13:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- FWIW, you could still get it to qualify if you were to nominate it at WP:GA and get it to pass – the article does look decent. BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll get to it sometime in the near future. Closing this nomination for now. I appreciate the review. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:18, 10 October 2024 (UTC)