Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eamonn Reading
No encyclopedic content. Vanity article. Joyous 02:08, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: This looks like a candidate for speedy. DCEdwards1966 02:23, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Under current CSD rules, I just couldn't justify it. I do think it's another reason to look at slightly widening candidate categories for CSD. Joyous 02:45, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Meet you at Wikipedia:Proposal to expand WP:CSD. Mikkalai 03:46, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Yeah, this is exactly the kind of article that's a poster child for expanding CSD. The article is rather obviously anti-vanity. I hate to confirm his view of himself as a loser, but the article's got to go. Geogre 04:45, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Occasionally an apparent vanity page turns out to be for real, which is why they should go through VFD, but this isn't one of those times. --Carnildo 06:47, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete (autobiographical). Eamonn, if you're reading this, there is nothing wrong with being a simpleton, but in general someone has to have done something pretty significant to merit an encylopedia article. — [[User:Knowledge Seeker|Knowledge Seeker দ (talk)]] 08:32, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Either joke, vanity or both. Eamonn, if you're reading this and it is a joke at your expense, it will soon be gone. Andrewa 17:13, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity, even if it is the least vain vanity of all time! P Ingerson 00:01, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Simply delete it. Dbiv 00:40, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)