Talk:Entropy

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Entropy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: 100 days

Entropy was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
February 20, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
November 29, 2019	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Delisted good article

‹See TfM›

Physics Top‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemistry High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics High‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Peter Bronson (May 8, 2005). "There's no such thing as an ordinary mom". Cincinnati Enquirer.

Archives

/Available Energy '03-(Nov)'05
/Disorder '04-(Nov)'05
/Archive 1 '05-(Mar)'06
/Archive 2 (Apr)'06-(Jul)'06, 165 kb
/Archive 3 (Jul)'06-(Sep)'06, 116 kb
/Archive 4 (Sep)'06-(Oct)'06, 95 kb
/Archive 5 (Oct)'06, 132 kb
/Archive 6 (Oct23-Nov13)'06, 78 kb
/Archive 7 (Nov13-Nov21)'06, 54 kb
/Archive 8 (Nov22)'06-(Jun18)'07, 48 kb
/Archive 9
/Archive 10
/Archive 11
/Archive 12
/Archive 13

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Discussion-free POV tag removed

There was an instance of Template:POV dated November 2022 buried in the middle of the Carnot cycle section. Baffled, I tried to find any relevant discussion, and could not. If there had been discussion, I would've changed the tag to {{POV statement}} (or moved the existing tag to the top of the article if it was genuinely meant to apply to the entire thing), but without any indication of why neutrality might be disputed it appears to be a case of WP:DRIVEBY. As such, I simply removed it. -- Proginoskes (talk) 06:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Economics"

The section on Entropy#Economics (near the bottom, under Interdisciplinary Applications) strikes me as very oddly written, and focusing a ton of effusive praise solely on the works of one Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen. I think it'd be better if this could be toned down and made into a more generalized overview, instead of a section just crediting this one guy with being the brightest mind since sliced bread. Hornpipe2 (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was added by Gaeanautes (talk · contribs). He has also contributed over 80% of the article for Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen in the same style. It has been questioned on the talk page at Talk:Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen#NPOV in introduction. While Georgescu-Roegen is very distinguished in his field, the article prose makes overly use of WP:PUFFERY and the WP:TONE is a too dramatic rather then academic. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Ludwig Boltzmann... found the link between the microscopic interactions, which fluctuate about an average configuration, to the macroscopically observable behavior, in form of a simple logarithmic law, with a proportionality constant, the Boltzmann constant, that has become one of the defining universal constants for the modern International System of Units (SI)".

Max Planck derived the equation, not Boltzmann, and Max Planck introduced the Boltzmann constant, not Boltzmann. 90.154.71.24 (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you can support this assertion (which I do not doubt), why don't you edit the page? Gpsanimator (talk) 22:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]