Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die on room

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. —Korath (Talk) 13:52, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Die on room

Huh? This is very nearly a speedy candidate (nonsense). -Aranel ("Sarah") 21:58, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nonsense. Delete article and content. -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:46, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I just don't get that nonsense. Zzyzx11 22:48, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
No "nearly" about it. I just speedy-deleted it as patent nonsense. Sounds to me like the output of one of those Markov-process text generators, though it probably isn't.... Entire content is shown below. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:27, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

There has been much debate in the scorpion community whether or not given "die on room" if any eggs will be put to there. While many would try to claim - even in the modern age - that the question is up for debate, nonetheless it has been reasonably proved that the die on room question can only come up in situations where, logically, eggs are put (see Wittgenstein).

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.