Talk:Conjoint analysis

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Merge suggestion

Maybe this article should be added to conjoint analysis (in marketing).An article entitled conjoint analysis would be more mathematical and less application specific. mydogategodshat 19:47, 14 Aug 2003 (UTC)

1. In the Ivy League example focus groups are a qualitative method of gathering feedback. Conjoint analysis is a quantitative technique requiring formal structured sampling methods and an appropriate base size.

2. It describes the use of a card sort exercise, which is just one form of conjoint analysis (Full Profile). Some discussion of choice-based conjoint and discrete choice modelling is also merited

3. This overlaps so strongly with the conjoint analysis (marketing) that they should be combined

Where's the math?

I agree, reading this article gives you no idea of how to actually do one. 78.149.121.22 (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unintelligible

No idea what this article is talking about. The basic concepts are not defined. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.226.185.110 (talk) 00:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article needs to be updated with an actual explaination of conjoint analysis. Also, i was looking for the types of conjoint analysis and here it never mentions there are different ways —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.63.96.96 (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Conjoint analysis (marketing) and Conjoint analysis (healthcare) be merged into Conjoint analysis. I think that the content in the these two articles can easily be explained in main page, there is duplicate content, and the merging of these articles will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Happybunny95 (talk) 08:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objections were received within 30 days. Also, following on from User:mydogategodshat's comment from 2003, proceeding with merger. Happybunny95 (talk) 00:03, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion on the Wiki article

Seems like there is a bit of self-promotion of Conjoint.ly. The user posted two images that link to the website, doesn't add much value for the reader. Pls, review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.13.6 (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The images were added because it was not possible to understand what a survey and outputs look like, not for promotion of anyone.Happybunny95 (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Market or Marketing research

Isn't Conjoint Analysis more often associated with Marketing research than to Market research? If so, I'd change the text and category accordingly. Solstag (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ISHIKAWAYI (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by ISHIKAWAYI (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]