Talk:UK railway stations – C

Trains: Stations / in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland.

Red or Black?

During the templatisation of stations A & C, I have been more ambitious: I have turned every station name into a [[... railway station|...]] link. This exercise added eight new blue links: North London Line plus Chadwell Heath and a nice long article on Chingford.

But it has created over 300 red links, many of which may never get filled.

Could I have a policy decision please:

create red links as here or
leave without links until articles get written?

NB. The dots are vital if you want me to remove the red links and the dots can be removed swiftly if the red links are to be kept. -- RHaworth 08:43, 2005 Mar 14 (UTC)

My vote is to keep the red links. Provided there is some chance of an article eventually appearing, I would always prefer to see a red link rather than no link at all. And as the number of extant station article shows, there is a good chance more will arrive. -- Chris j wood 00:58, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep - thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:08, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- edd 09:35, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Why does A redirect to C

I'm mystified as to why stations beginning with A and C seem both to be in this article, with UK railway stations - A redirecting here. Yet B has its own page. I'm not sure if this is a mistake, or work in progress, or what. -- Chris j wood 00:58, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ditto. I've contacted RHaworth and asked him look at the A / C issue. I guess it's WIP. --Tagishsimon (talk)