Talk:Le Ton beau de Marot

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Untitled

Random question: Even though Hofstadter has been clearly influenced by W. V. O. Quine in many of his previous works (and coined the word quine to refer to a self-describing computer program), and even though Quine writes extensively on the subject of language and translation, Hofstadter does not cite Quine at all in Le Ton beau de Marot, which is chiefly concerned with translation. Does anyone know why he doesn't? —FOo 21:51, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I suppose his rambings didn't happen to veer that way. Chameleon 21:56, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Numerous claims — for example, "the size of the book must also be a reference to a kind of 'physical pun'", "a particularly strong theme of this book is the loss of Hofstadter's wife", and "the poem dedicated to 'a sick lady' gains yet another deeply tragic and personal meaning" — appear to be the editor's original research. 98.232.19.129 (talk) 07:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...yet the article is pretty well written. --grin ✎ 12:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the lines The size of the book must also be a reference to a kind of "physical pun". At around 600 pages the work is a veritable "tome" as well, particularly as the cover image contains a cross headstone and graveyard references.. They sound quite unencyclopaedic and are very much the editor's opinions. --VdSV9•♫ 17:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]