Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayapataka Swami
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
non notable 66.68.156.175 00:26, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If the claims in the article are true (and the nominator does not suggest otherwise), than this person is as notable as any leader of any religious sect. -- BD2412 talk 00:40, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
- NOTICE: The user who nominated the above article has quite recently nominated about a dozen others with exactly the same message, "not notable". They are all related to cult worship, dynamics, and history. It is my opinion that this anon is probably promoting an alti-cultist adgenda on Wikipedia and should be cencored. The pages he submits for vfd should all be marked distinctly as keep unless they are really not notable. Most, however, do have a claim to notability. Thanks for your consideration. Ryan Prior 01:51, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Religious leaders are generally notable. Capitalistroadster 03:18, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Weird, certainly not in my area of interest, but a valid article. --Unfocused 03:39, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Same anon trying its best to remove articles that have a valid history. POV warrior for sure. ≈ jossi ≈ 04:37, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - Definitely notable -CunningLinguist 08:54, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.