Talk:The Godfather (novel)

Initial text

Since its release on March 15, 1972, The Godfather has been accused of glorifying the image of the Mafia, although this word is never spoken in the film, or written in the book (although the word is spoken in the first sequel film)

This is silly, and factually wrong. See: http://people.freenet.de/kvlampe/PUZOGODF.htm#mafia. The word "mafia" is used through out the book, and probably the movie, which only makes sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.57.233.74 (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2004 (UTC)

Sales

Over on the Mario Puzo Wikipedia page, it says this was on the NYT best-seller list for several weeks. That ought to be worth mentioning, but I don't feel like I should be citing another Wikipedia page as a source - I didn't find the source over there, anyone know one?Alexgriz (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Titling

I was under the impression that the term "Godfather" in this context was invented by Mario Puzo. Is it really the case that the term "Godfather" was derived from the testimony of Joe Valachi? This definitely needs a citation.

Mafia

The word Mafia does not appear anywhere in the first film, neither does the term 'Cosa Nostra' or 'Our Thing' due to pressure from an Italian American Civil Rights group that had been formed by mobster Joe Colombo. The aim of the group was to improve Italian reputations by removing any hints of Italian links to crime in TV or Film, along with Italian terminology in Radio adverts. However the real purpose of the group was to get the police off their backs by making the police look discriminatory whenever an Italian was arressted or interogated for mafia related crimes.

My response to the previous unsigned, undated blather is "So what?" This Wiki page is for the novel after all, not the movie.John Simpson54 (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Don

In the following two paragraphs I think that "Don" on it's own isn't used properly. I don't know Italian, but in Spanish it's not a title but just a particle you put in front of someone's name to indicate respect, hence "Don" alone would be like "Mister" in English. Can someone confirm this?

The role of Don Vito Corleone was memorably acted by Marlon Brando, and Brando won an Academy Award for his portrayal of the aging Don. Many of the actors playing the supporting roles were largely unknown or minor actors; however, they rocketed into the limelight with the success of The Godfather. In particular, Pacino and Robert Duvall enjoyed long, successful, highly acclaimed careers.

Since its release on March 15, 1972, The Godfather has been accused of glorifying the image of the Mafia. Don Vito Corleone was portrayed by Brando as a Mafia Don whom people could actually respect (although the actions of Don Michael Corleone in The Godfather Part II worked to tear down this image).

I also don't know any Italian, but I read the novel a couple weeks ago, and the usage in the paragraphs you've mentioned is accurate insofar and the usage in the book. 74.110.71.97 01:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)bhjjh

Clean Up

I think before any clean up is made we should decide whether the article should give a taster of the plot not exposing the finale, giving a general gist of the plot throughout or an in depth analysis of the entire plot. As the current article is leaning more towards the latter it would be alot harder to revert towards either of the former while keeping alot of hard work and relevant information. Gfad1 21:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This article had a complete plot synopsis when I saw it. If it was aiming for a thorough analysis, then it was too brief and didn't cover a lot of the symbolism that made the film so potent. Something like this might have been the goal.

On the other hand, if it was just supposed to be an overview, then I agree—it's far too long.

As for a decision, I vote for the brief overview to at least bring the article back up to par again, but to continue work on the thorough analysis in talk.

—Ghakko 23:15, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, since no one objected, here it is.  ;-)

Looking over the synopsis briefly, I think we ought to have detailed commentary on at least:

• The opening wedding scenes (done).
• Showdown at the hospital.
• Murder at the restaurant.
• The baptism/massacre.
• The closing scene in Michael's office.

That's a lot of editing, so I'll plug away bit by bit. Feel free to jump in. ;-)

—Ghakko 00:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Plot synopsis

The film opens with "I believe in America"—a speech by Bonasera the undertaker (played by Salvatore Corsitto), who comes to Corleone during his daughter's wedding for help in settling his family affairs. The following dialogue between Corleone and Bonasera is one of the most memorable introductions to the Mafia in film, emphasizing the importance of family and personal relationships in Mafia business and the niche they hold within the American dream. Corleone agrees to help and we see Bonasera inducted into the Mafia way of doing business: he is now indebted to the Godfather, as would be a client of a Roman patron.

The opening scene is set in a dark, quiet, wood-panelled office in the Corleone family home in New York and contrasts with the noisy, joyous and hectic wedding party in the bright sunshine outside, symbolizing the subtle and veiled manner in which the Mafia typically operates.

At the wedding party, we are introduced to the sons of the Corleone family: hotheaded, violent Sonny (played by James Caan), awkward, goofy Fredo (John Cazale), Michael (Al Pacino)'s aloofness and disapproval of the family business and Tom Hagen, the level-headed family consigliere.

Johnny Fontane, the Don's godson and a famous singer, makes an appearance and requests a favor from the Godfather. (Many commentators drew parallels between Fontane and Frank Sinatra or Dean Martin.) There is a movie being produced in Hollywood that he feels would do good for his career. Unfortunately, the director of the movie refuses to give him the part and he feels that the Don must intercede on his behalf. Corleone reassures Fontane, "I'll make him an offer he can't refuse."

Hagen flies to Hollywood to negotiate with Jack Woltz at Woltz International Pictures. Hagen is welcomed to Woltz's own house once the producer realizes that he represents the Corleone family and is not merely a "two-bit hustler" hired by Johnny to intimidate him. Woltz, however, still refuses to give Johnny the part, explaining that he bears a grudge against Fontane for running off with a young lady he had been grooming as the next biggest hit in Hollywood and that he had taken it upon himself to run Johnny out of Hollywood. The next morning, Woltz wakes up to find himself covered in blood and the head of his prized racehorse in his bed. The scene closes with his screams echoing across the compound. The subplot of Fontane, Woltz, and Hagen, does not have a major impact on future events of the film but illustrates the great power and reach of the Corleone family.

(The scene with the horse's head was one of the most controversial in the film, with animal-rights groups protesting the use of an actual horse's head. Coppola, however, stated that the head came from a dog food company and that no horse had been killed specifically for the film.)

After Tom's return to New York, Victor Sollozzo from the rival Tattaglia family approaches the Corleones, offering them a share of the lucrative narcotics business in exchange for access to political protection. Sonny thinks it a good idea to join with Sollozzo and Tom agrees, but the Don feels the enterprise would be too risky. He turns down Sollozzo, respectfully and in person, and wishes him good fortune on his own. However, Sollozzo feels that he must have the support of the Corleone family and is not satisfied with a mere "good luck". He then sets his plan into motion.

The Don&with his regular bodyguard Paulie home sick—is gunned down at the greengrocer's while buying oranges (in all three Godfather movies, the presence of oranges signifies impending death). He miraculously survives but remains in critical condition and is rushed to hospital. Paulie, who is revealed as a traitor, is then killed by Clemenza (one of the Don's henchmen) and an accomplice by in a famous roadside scene. "Leave the gun. Take the cannoli."

Sadly, Don Vito is not even safe in the hospital when, under the pay of Sollozzo, Police Captain McCluskey arrests the Mafia guards placed to guard the Don and leaves the path open for Sollozzo hitmen to finish the job. Michael, visiting his father, notices the lack of any guards and, with the help of an innocent baker who came to pay his respects to the injured Don, gives the hitmen the impression that there are guards in place and an assault would only end in an open gunbattle. With his failure to kill the Don, and the realization that Sonny, Don now that Vito is incapacitated, would hunt him down no matter how much of a boon the drug industry could be, Sollozzo decides it better to broker a truce rather than continue a fight he had no hope of winning. He tries to arrange a meeting with Michael, who has previously had no involvement with the criminal side of the Corleone business, but that does not go as planned.

Sollozzo's plan to avoid being killed rested on three points: 1) He has a Police Captain, McCluskey, as a personal bodyguard and on his personal payroll. Nobody in Mafia history had killed a Police Captain before, the retaliation from the Police and other Families would be fatal. 2) The location for his negotiations with Michael would be a secret from everybody except himself, McCluskey, and the driver of their car. Even Michael wouldn't know until they arrived. Thus, no hitmen would be waiting for them to do what they thought Michael couldn't. 3) Michael had shown nothing but disdain for the Corleone Family business, seeking to distance himself from all aspects of the criminal life. He had kept himself clean throughout his entire life and even served with distinction in the United States Marine Corps during World War II. Sollozzo felt that Michael would not act rashly like Sonny was known to do. Unfortunately, Sollozzo had overlooked three facts that cancelled out his three points: 1) McCluskey was a dirty cop; the people on the Corleone payroll in the newspaper industry would easily profit from the story of him being killed in a Mafia shooting and his murder could thus be attributed to "business". The other Mafia families would thus have nothing to retaliate over. 2) Police Captains had to be on call 24/7, McCluskey had signed where he was going to be and the Corleone plant in the Police relayed the information to Sonny, this allowed them to plant a gun in advance for Michael to use. 3) Michael might not have been intimately involved in the running of the criminal empire set up by his father, but he did love his father and did not take kindly to an attempted murder. He sought vengeance. In a meeting with Sonny, Clemenza, Hagen, and Tessio after the incident at the hospital, Michael makes the case that Sollozo is too dangerous to be left alive, and outlines his plan that shows he has the intelligence and master planning abilities that the rest of Vito's sons lack.

The ensuing tension exploded when Michael killed both Sollozzo and McCluskey at the meeting, vengeance for his father. The other four of the five families of New York went to war with the Corleones over his actions, violence and vengeance were now dominant over business and Sonny thrived in his element. Michael goes to hide in Sicily for several years - even the Corleone connections could not protect him from a government who sought him over the murder of a Police Captain - where he fell in love with a woman named Appollonia. The two get married, but Appollonia is murdered by one of Michael's bodyguards, Fabrizzio, after bad news reaches them from the States. Santino Corleone is murdered at a toll booth by a large group of men with Thompson 1928 guns. He had been rushing to his sister's house where she was being beaten by her husband when he was ambushed on the road. Upon learning of his oldest son's death, Don Vito, home from the hospital and regaining his health, calls a meeting of the heads of the Five Families and other Mafia bosses from all over the United States. At the meeting he states his wish to end the War among the Families, a war which is tearing apart their entire way of life and ruining everyone. He forgoes all rights of vengeance over his son, Sonny, and hopes the others will also halt their attacks and retaliations. However, he states that he does not forgive anything that might happen to Michael, soon to return from Sicily, and that even if he is struck by lightning the Don will take revenge. The other Dons agree, provided that Don Vito concede to allow drug trafficking in a controlled manner, and peace is restored. While driving home from the meeting Don Vito reveals to Tom Hagen that he believes that although it was Tattaglia's men that killed Sonny, it was Barzini's (another New York boss) masterplan all along.

After the death of Appollonia, Michael remains in Sicily for a while before returning home. This is the time during which Mario Puzo's The Sicilian takes place. Upon returning home, the power in the family is gradually transferred to Michael, who seems to have lost his loathing for the family business and marries his old college sweetheart Kay Adams. Michael is advised by Don Vito not to take any revenge for what happened to Sonny and to make plans to move the family to Las Vegas. This causes splits within the family with Tessio and Clemenza requesting that they be allowed to form a separate family, yet Michael tells them that once they have made the move to Nevada they are free to form their own families. Michael travels to Las Vegas and meets Moe Green, a casino owner and a powerful man in the city. Michael requests that the Corleone family be allowed to buy his half of a casino, but he turns down the offer, saying he will not be muscled out of the city he owns.

Back in New York, Don Vito advises Michael that Barzini will make a move on him, arrange a meeting at which he will be assassinated. The Don unwilling to pass the torch to Michael, stating that he wanted different things for his youngest son, but ultimately accepts Michael's fate as the leader of the family. He also says that whoever approaches Michael with this meeting is the traitor, repeating his advice over and over. In the next scene the Don has a heart attack while playing with his grandson in the garden. This scene is most famous for being completely ad-libbed by Brando. And at his grand funeral Tessio asks Michael if he will meet Barzini on his own territory where he will be 'safe'.

In one of the last scenes in the movie, after Michael reveals his plans to buy out his main competition in Las Vegas, Michael acts as godfather in the baptism of his sister's newborn baby, Michael Rizzi (played by Sofia Coppola). At the same time, his henchmen, acting under his orders, kill all the heads of the other four families, Cuneo, Tattaglia, Strachi and Barzini, and Moe Green, his business opponent in Vegas. This massacre removes any anger still borne against the Corleone's from the killing of Sollozzo and McCluskey many years ago, solidifies Michael Corleone's position as the most powerful mob boss in America, and paves the way for his domination of the gambling scene in Las Vegas. This is Michael Corleone's own baptism into "the family" as the new Godfather. Michael's next move is to have Tessio, his father's most loyal captain, killed for betraying him, and finally Michael has Carlo Rizzi killed, revealing that it was Carlo who was responsible for Santino's death by betraying him to Barzini. The ambush on the road which had Sonny killed was obviously planned in advance, and required the participation of either Sonny's sister or brother-in-law to draw Santino away from his fortress in a rage without his bodyguards.

Note: Notice that the movie starts out with the wedding of Carlo Rizzi and Connie and ends with the end of their marriage with the murder of Carlo by Michael. Michael becomes everything he promised he would not.

Michael is questioned by Kay about his involvement in the death of Carlo. Michael lies to his wife, saying "No." when she asks him. She is momentarily relieved, but watches from outside the Don's office as Michael is called "Don Corleone" for the first time by Clemenza. As his bodyguard Neri closes the door on Kay, she realizes what her husband has become as the film fades to black.

Re-furnished this entry

I'm going to furnish, clean up and add much more information to this entry, and have already started, adding an infobox, links and furnishing the introduction, as well as including this entry into WikiProject Novels. A detailed plot summary, character information and critical acclaim sections will follow soon. - Ganryuu 08:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Labia Rejuvenation?

I think it should be noted on the main page how the book details labia rejuvenation whereas the movie completely ignores that sideplot.

Video Games?

Discussing the EA video game adaptation of the Godfather movie is probably not necessary here since it is, after all, an adaptation of the movie, and not the book. (If retained, some mention should also be made of the earlier 1991 Godfather video game -- but more likely the section here should be axed and mention of the board game shipped on over to the movie page.) Pseudo Intellectual 10:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Also -- yow, that previous section is quite an item.

Cleaning up The Godfather articles

I consider myself the world’s foremost authority <er, VBG?> on The Godfather, the novel. I sometimes thought that I knew the book better than Mario Puzo had himself. Before he passed away, I often wished that I could have met him so that I could have scolded him on what a sloppy effort it was, notwithstanding it being a true masterpiece rivaling the works of the immortal bard. When I say what a sloppy book it is, I am not referring to Mr. Puzo’s lamentable (or perhaps laudable) lack of knowledge regarding the true nature of organized crime. Nobody takes the book seriously on that count. Even FFC called it a "fairy tale."

What I am referring to is that I once noted several different consistency mistakes within it. It is almost as if that since the editorship knew it was going to be a runaway bestseller upon the first read, no one bothered to proofread it. Why bother? Just rush to print!

(Why bother? Because one should take pride in one’s work!)

Probably the most egregious example is where in one chapter Don Corleone (in bed) hears cars coming to the house at midnight and knows instantly something is amiss. He then rises from his sick bed to confront Hagen downstairs who gives him the news about Sonny. According to the narrative, it was then (after the impromptu meeting with the capos) that Hagen called Bonoasera per the don's directive. Yet, in another chapter, the undertaker receives the very same call and it is dinner time.

Another example would be that Clemenza is chosen to kill Carlo Rizzi to avenge Sonny’s murder because he was Sonny’s godfather. Yet, in Book III, it is stated that Clemenza doesn’t even meet Vito Corleone until after Fredo, the second son and child, is born. (Besides, why would Corleone have chosen Clemenza for such a high honor (especially for Italian people) in regard to his firstborn son and not Genco Abbandando, his best friend and future consigliere?)

What makes the book a masterpiece is Mr. Puzo’s profound grasp of human nature and his ability to translate such into the written word. The characterizations are superb and rival Shakespeare’s. Mr. Puzo had an almost feminine perception and intuition. Few writers had his or her hand on the pulse of human nature as solidly as had Mr. Puzo.

Nevertheless, just as the book is so sloppy, I’ve noticed a tendency towards the same carelessness when it comes to many of The Godfather related Wikipedia articles. To that effect, I intend to clean up these articles and expunge all inaccuracies that I find. I have already begun with the Clemenza article where the article had Clemenza personally killing Paulie Gatto (it had been, of course, Lampone in both the novel and the movie) and beating up the two punks who had attacked Bonoasera’s daughter. (It had been Gatto along with two ex-boxers who are now Corleone Family loan shark associates.)

As my time is limited right now, this will be a slow and gradual process as an ongoing effort to purify all entries concerning our beloved novel. Please think twice about undoing any edits I make as I know the book as Fundamentalists know the Bible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.75.114 (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Addendum: I found the main article on The Godfather, the novel, to be both well-written and accurate. I just added some parenthetical information (under "The families") for the sake of clarity, which I hope the article’s author will let stand as I believe it provides clarity and points to the inherent weaknesses within the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.145.75.114 (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Was this book written with an adaptation in mind?

I seem to remember hearing some time ago that this was a novel written for the specific purpose of providing a source for a later film adaptation. If I remember correctly Paramount was involved with the novel right from the start and may even have funded it. Is there any substance at all or am I completely on the wrong track? Oliver9184 (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

--No, not at all. Mr. Puzo received critical acclaim for The Fortunate Pilgrim but not all that much in the way of royalties. There was a minor character in that novel who was on the periphery of organized crime as a numbers runner. His publisher noted that many seemed interested in that subject. As Mr. Puzo was a federal civil servant struggling to raise a family, he related that his response was: “All right! If they want Mafia, I’ll give them Mafia!”

He later recounted that his first problem was that he wouldn’t have known a Mafioso if he had tripped over one. “Just because I’m Italian, people think I must be some kind of expert on the subject.” So he did research and, as the book attests to, not all that thoroughly. The book’s subject matter is woefully misrepresented as he paints Mafia chiefs as sort of pseudo-aristocrats, almost like Renaissance Italian city-state potentates along the lines of the Medici. It’s not surprising that he would later become interested in the Borgias and write a novel regarding them.

In regard to agreeing to write a book about the Mafia, he made a quote which saliently summarizes his thought processes and frustration at the time. Although the quote is from memory, and not verbatim, it comes close: “If some fool wants to create a work of art, then let him discover the joys of self-publishing!” (Mr. Puzo was not expressing his own sentiments, rather those within the publishing environment as he perceived them (presumably with disdain)).

Ironically, I do consider The Godfather to be a classic work of art, notwithstanding its many flaws, as I noted in my previous comments (“Cleaning up The Godfather articles”). Apparently, whoever wrote the screenplay for the romantic comedy You’ve Got Mail must feel likewise as indicated by the references to the novel within the movie.

If you are interested, you can read the transcript of Mr. Puzo’s interview on Larry King Live available at the official Mario Puzo Library online. Of course, the novel was eminently suited to have been adapted into a screenplay, but that was not Mr. Puzo’s motivation. His motivation, at least originally, was to make some decent money from book writing, a goal achieved beyond his wildest dreams! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryBuff14 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Article needs to say more about the book's worth

The article says very little about The Godfather's literary value, the ideas discussed within the book, the major themes, etc. An addition of those is definitely needed. LaughingSkull (talk) 18:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

No plot summary

Why is there no plot summary? I would do it but I have never read the book. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 02:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions)
How about this?  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 10:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

? Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 20:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

@ Disc Wheel (talk) Try the link again!
 –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 21:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Well like I said, I haven't read the novel but from just by looking at it, it seems that it was taken from the movie page since it has the actors names in parenthesis? Also is there a reason why I can't make some changes to the plot summary on the movie page? Because there are a couple poorly constructed sentences that stick out... Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 21:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

@ Disc Wheel (talk)
First make your criticism clear on the film's Talk, together with how you would write these couple of sentences, please. Cheers!  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 21:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The Godfather Effect material

The material about the book "The Godfather Effect" is an unusual insertion - it's also been injected into the article about the movie, and in separate articles about the book "The Godfather Effect" and its author. I think it should be removed, as its main intent seems to be to promote the "The Godfather Effect."Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Oh, and I also wonder about the accuracy of some of the material, i.e., the Michael Corleone quote that is repeated in all four articles.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

I have always thought it does not belong in the film article. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 21:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

It would be helpful to have a reference in the book or film article about myths created by these portrayals, compared to what were the realities of the mob at that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.192.29 (talk) 02:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

E.G.

https://www.biography.com/news/godfather-true-stories-books-movies

https://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/the-myth-of-the-american-dream-francis-ford-coppolas-the-godfather-trilogy/

Myths become belief and people forget that fiction is not factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.192.29 (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Connie Corleone Page Missing

There is no page for Connie Corleone. She doesn't even get red links. What in the world is that about? This is 2014, people. I'm making it now. Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

In the novel she is not much featured. whereas her role in the first and third films is prominent — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 00:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Alright, I guess I'll go complain @ the film trilogy talk page. Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Link to no mention of godfather or puzo

The link to crime novel makes no mention in that article of the book or puzo. Should it? As does the Italian American writers.SharpQuillPen (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

@ SharpQuillPenIf you are referring to the opening line, then "No". That is a link to clarify what is meant by the expression "crime novel" and leads you to this — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Offer He Cannot Refuse

Could someone rework the following then place in the appropriate place regarding the origins/inspirations for the saying? Thanks.

Literary reference

Honoré de Balzac's novels have been the inspiration for noteable lines that have gain wide popularity in cinema history. The novel opens with an epigraph from Balzac: "Behind every great fortune there is a crime." Belzac's line from Le Pere Goriot (1834), when Vautrin tells Eugene: "In that case I will make you an offer that no one would decline." seems to be the inspiration for Mario Puzo's, "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse," the second ranking cinematic quote included in AFI's 100 Years...100 Movie Quotes (2005) by the American Film Institute originally in his novel The Godfather (1969) and used in the film adaptation (1972).

References

Excision

Just removed the section about "Title" controversy. There was no citation or reference. I'm familiar with the subject, and can recall no such controversy. An investigation revealed this info was added in 2007 by an IP address editor with a history of disruptive editing and bans, inactive since 2009. Ergo removal. The section added only speculation to the article. Tapered (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Paragraph about the cover in the lead

The WP:lead is supposed to be an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents. It had a paragraph with a detailed written explanation of the cover but does not explain why we had so much detail in this explanation. There is no mention of the cover in the article body. I deleted the paragraph but for the record it was:

S. Neil Fujita created a book cover with a marionette puppet theme. The title is in a single column of bold white Gothic letters against a black background. The word "Godfather" has the extended upper horizontal arm of the "G" and the vertical arm of the "d" separated by a black "string" line that descends from the upper right corner where are held the controls in a hand of the "manipulator". White strings descend to the f, t, h, e and r.

The cited source does not go into this detail which left me puzzled as to why it was in this article. --Marc Kupper|talk 05:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your revision and your thoughtful explanation here. The removed copy does not belong in the Lead.
Is it perhaps worth adding it at the lower part of the page with the template that requests a full citation? If it is not forthcoming in, say, three months, we delete it again.
Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 08:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Gareth, I agree that we could put something in the body. Google for 'Godfather cover strings'^[1] finds that the image used on the cover seems to be well known. Unfortunately, I could not find a WP:RS that says it's well known, iconic, etc. I also can't find anything in Google News, Books, nor Scholar about the letters "f, t, h, e and r". I don't think we need that detail in the Wikipedia article. The things that we could have in the article are:

The hand/puppet cover art was designed by S. Neil Fujita. This image was later used in the movie. (we need a WP:RS for this)

I did some hunting around for the second source but did not see anything I liked. There's this but it does not seem like a high quality site. Mental Floss is referenced from nearly 400 WP pages though. --Marc Kupper|talk 22:14, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks for your research. Maybe someone else could throw some more light on this..? — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 11:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Godfather (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060503045430/http://www3.isrl.uiuc.edu/~unsworth/courses/bestsellers/search.cgi?title=The+Godfather to http://www3.isrl.uiuc.edu/~unsworth/courses/bestsellers/search.cgi?title=The+Godfather

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Removal of Salvatore as Tessio's given name

Adding comment in talk page because part of my edit note was lost. According to the wiki article on this character, his given name "Salvatore" is only provided in the film and not in the novel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:85C1:A60:F13B:73A5:EBA6:6594 (talk) 13:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Five Families

The article states that "The Corleone family fights a mob war with the other four Mafia families in New York...," but all of the clear evidence is that the Corleones are fighting five opponents. The sole ambiguity is that Stracchi, Cuneo, Tattaglia, and Barzini, and their families, are described together in the peace conference chapter, but even there it overtly says says the five men arrived last (Vito had arrived first) and that five (not capitalized) Families were fighting the Corleones.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)