Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Euell
was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was
Non-notable (exactly 2 Google hits) vanity. And he said it himself "and now this recent addition will be Removed (sic)" [[User:Lachatdelarue|Lachatdelarue (talk)]] 23:35, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Vanity. Delete. RickK 23:41, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Agree - Delete. --Nought 23:44, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I actually believe this could have been speedy deleted as a newbie test; the last sentence suggests that; it reads to me more like a test article than a serious vanity page. But anyway... delete. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 01:09, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: I'm convinced this was a test. He probably thought he could take it down himself, and that's probably what he was getting at. Geogre 01:55, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.