Talk:Vulva
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vulva article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Vulva has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Vulva.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
If you find some images offensive you can configure your browser to mask them. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Inaccurate
[edit]Re: 'The most prevalent form of non-consensual genital alteration is that of female genital mutilation.'
No. It is not. Non-consensual male genital alteration is very much more prevalent. This almost certainly deliberately misleading statement ought to be explicitly qualified with reference to the female sex.
And the opinion female neonate genital alteration can be thought cosmetic, aesthetic, or therapeutic, as male genital alteration habitually is [albeit and notwithstanding it is so stated invariably without any rigorous scientific justification, and erroneously in relation to both sexes], and need not necessarily be considered a form of mutilation, should be acknowledged.
That would address the implicit sexism vis-a-vis 'genital alteration' in this article as it presently stands. The mere prevalence of this expression of sexism does not in any way negate the necessity of it's correction. 49.186.44.135 (talk) 18:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this paragraph is blatant sexism and needs to be corrected. Male genital mutilation is counted in the billions and obviously much more prevalent. 31.209.43.217 (talk) 10:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class Anatomy articles
- High-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about gross anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- GA-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Top-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- GA-Class women's health articles
- High-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles