Andrewsarchus
| Andrewsarchus Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Mammalia |
| Order: | Artiodactyla |
| Clade: | Cetancodontamorpha |
| Family: | †Andrewsarchidae Szalay & Gould, 1966[2] |
| Genus: | †Andrewsarchus Osborn, 1924[1] |
| Type species | |
| †Andrewsarchus mongoliensis Osborn, 1924
| |
| Other species | |
| |
| Synonyms | |
Andrewsarchus (/ˌændruːˈsɑːrkəs/), meaning "Andrews' ruler", is an extinct genus of artiodactyl (even-toed ungulate) that lived during the Middle Eocene in China. It contains two species, A. mongoliensis and A. crassum. It was formerly placed in the families Mesonychidae or Arctocyonidae, but is now the sole member of a distinct family, Andrewsarchidae, and may have been a distant relative of entelodonts.[7] Known from a largely complete cranium, as well most of a mandible and isolated teeth, it is notable for being reputed as the largest terrestrial, carnivorous mammal,[1] though its size may have been historically overestimated.[2]
Taxonomy
[edit]
Early history
[edit]The holotype of Andrewsarchus mongoliensis, a mostly-complete cranium (AMNH-VP 20135),[8] was recovered from the lower Irdin Manha Formation of Inner Mongolia.[1][9] Prior to its description, it was noted that it resembled the skulls of entelodontids, such as Daeodon and Entelodon, which was noted by Henry Fairfield Osborn.[1] A sketch of the skull was sent to the American Museum of Natural History in New York, where it was identified by William Diller Matthew as belonging to: "the primitive Creodonta of the family Mesonychidae".[1] The specimen itself arrived at the museum and was described by Osborn. Its generic name is in honour of Roy Chapman Andrews, the leader of the expedition on which it was discovered, with the Ancient Greek archos (ἀρχός, "ruler") added to his surname.[1]
A second species of Andrewsarchus, A. crassum, was named by Ding Suyin and colleagues in 1977 on the basis of IVPP V5101,[10] a pair of premolars recovered from the Dongjun Formation of Guangxi.[11][5]
In the 1957, Zhou Mingzhen and colleagues recovered a mandible, a fragmentary maxilla, and several isolated teeth from the Lushi Formation of Henan, China, which correlates to the Irdin Manha Formation. The maxilla belonged to a skull, likely from the same individual as the mandible, which was crushed beyond recognition.[4] Zhou described it in 1959 as Paratriisodon henanensis, and assigned it to Arctocyonidae. He further classified it as part of the subfamily Triisodontinae (now the family Triisodontidae) based on close similarities between the molars and premolars of P. henanensis and those of Triisodon.[4] A second species, P. gigas, was named by Zhou and colleagues in 1973 for a molar also from the Lushi Formation. Three molars and an incisor from the Irdin Manha Formation were later referred to P. gigas.[12] Paratriisodon was first synonymised with Andrewsarchus in 1978, by Leigh Van Valen, who did so without explanation.[13] Regardless, their synonymy was upheld by Maureen O'Leary in 1998, based on similarities between the molars and premolars of the two genera and their similar body sizes.[5]
Classification
[edit]Andrewsarchus was initially regarded as a mesonychid,[1] and Paratriisodon as an arctocyonid.[12] In 1966, the former became the sole member of its own subfamily, Andrewsarchinae, within Mesonychia.[14] The subfamily was elevated to family level by Philip D. Gingerich in 1998, who tentatively assigned Paratriisodon to it.[15] Andrewsarchus has since been recovered as a member of Cetancodontamorpha, most closely related to entelodonts, hippos, and whales.[7][16] In 2023, Yu and colleagues conducted a phylogenetic analysis of Ferae, with a particular focus on entelodontid artiodactyls. Andrewsarchus was recovered as part of a clade consisting of itself, Achaenodon, Erlianhyus, Protentelodon, Wutuhyus, and Entelodontidae. It was recovered as most closely related to Achaenodon and Erlianhyus, with which it formed a polytomy. A simplified cladogram based on their phylogeny is reproduced below:[7]
Description
[edit]
When first describing Andrewsarchus, Osborn believed it to be the largest terrestrial, carnivorous mammal. Based on the length of the A. mongoliensis holotype skull, and using the proportions of Mesonyx, he estimated a total body length of 3.82 m (12.5 ft) and a body height of 1.89 m (6.2 ft).[1] However, considering cranial and dental similarities with entelodonts, Frederick Szalay and Stephen Jay Gould proposed that it had proportions less like mesonychids and more like them, and thus that Osborn's estimates were likely inaccurate.[2]
Skull
[edit]The holotype skull of Andrewsarchus has a total length of 83.4 cm (2.74 ft), and is 56 cm (1.84 ft) wide at the zygomatic arches. The snout is greatly elongated, measuring one-and-a-half times the length of the basicranium,[1] and the portion of the snout anterior to the canines resembles that of entelodonts. The sagittal crest is reduced, and the mandibular fossa is relatively flat, with underdeveloped preglenoid and postglenoid processes. Together, these attributes suggest a weak temporalis muscle and a fairly weak bite force. The hard palate is long and narrow.[2] The mandible is long and shallow, characterised by a straight and relatively shallow horizontal ramus.[4] The masseteric fossa, the depression on the mandible to which the masseter attaches, is shallow. Symphyseal contact between the two mandibles is limited.[2]
Dentition
[edit]
Andrewsarchus' upper jaw demonstrates the typical placental tooth formula,[2] though it is not clear whether the same applies to the mandible. The upper incisors are arranged in a semicircle in front of the canines, a trait that is shared with entelodonts. I2 is enlarged, and is almost the size of the canines.[2] This is partly because, while described by Osborn as being "of enormous size",[1] the canines themselves are relatively small in proportion to the rest of the dentition.[2] The upper premolars are elongate and unicuspid, resembling those of entelodonts. P4 retains the protocone, though in a vestigial form.[1] The premolars' roots are not confluent and lack a dentine platform, which are both likely to be adaptation to prolong the tooth's functional life after crown abrasion. M1 is the smallest of the molars. M2 is the widest, though has been heavily worn. M3 is relatively unworn, and more information can be gleaned from it. The crown is wrinkled, similar to the condition seen in suids and other omnivorous artiodactyls.[2] The tooth structure of the mandible is difficult to determine, as nearly all are worn or broken. All of the right mandible's teeth are preserved save for P1, which is instead preserved on the left mandible. The lower canine and P1 both point forwards.[2] M3 is large, with talonids that essentially have two cusps.[4]
Diet
[edit]In his paper describing Andrewsarchus, Osborn suggested that it may have been omnivorous based on comparisons with entelodonts.[1] This conclusion was supported by Szalay and Gould, who cite the heavily wrinkled crowns of the cheek teeth as supporting evidence,[2] as well as the close phylogenetic relationship between Andrewsarchus and entelodonts.[7][16]
Palaeoecology
[edit]
For much of the Eocene, a hothouse climate with humid, tropical environments with consistently high precipitations prevailed. Modern mammalian orders including the Perissodactyla, Artiodactyla, and Primates (or the suborder Euprimates) appeared already by the early Eocene, diversifying rapidly and developing dentitions specialized for folivory. The omnivorous forms mostly either switched to folivorous diets or went extinct by the middle Eocene (47–37 Ma) along with the archaic "condylarths". By the late Eocene (approx. 37–33 Ma), most of the ungulate form dentitions shifted from bunodont cusps to cutting ridges (i.e. lophs) for folivorous diets.[17][18]
The Irdin Manha Formation, from which the holotype of Andrewsarchus was recovered, consists of Irdinmanhan strata dated to the Middle Eocene.[19] Andrewsarchus itself comes from the IM-1 locality, dated to the lower Irdinmanhan,[20] from which the hyaenodontine Propterodon, the mesonychid Harpagolestes, at least three unnamed mesonychids,[2] the perissodactyls Deperetella and Lophialetes, the omomyid Tarkops, the glirian Gomphos, the rodent Tamquammys, and various indeterminate glirians are also known.[19][20] The Lushi Formation, from which the Paratriisodon henanensis specimen was recovered, was deposited at around the same time as the Irdin Manha Formation. The mesonychid Mesonyx, the pantodont Eudinoceras, the dichobunid Dichobune, the helohyid Gobiohyus, the brontotheres Rhinotitan and Microtitan, and the perissodactyls Amynodon and Lophialetes have been identified from the Lushi Formation.[4]
See also
[edit]
References
[edit]
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Osborn, H.F. (1924). "Andrewsarchus, giant mesonychid of Mongolia". American Museum Novitates (146): 1–5. hdl:2246/3226.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Szalay, F.S.; Gould, S.J. (1966). "Asiatic Mesonychidae (Mammalia, Condylartha)". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 132 (2): 127–174. hdl:2246/1112.
- ^ Ding, S.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, Y. (1977). "The age and characteristic of the Liuniu and the Dongjun faunas, Bose Basin of Guangxi" (PDF). Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 15 (1): 35–45.
- ^ a b c d e f Chow, M.M. (1959). "A new arctocyonid from the Upper Eocene of Lushih, Honan" (PDF). Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 3 (3): 133–138.
- ^ a b c O'Leary, M.A. (1998). "Phylogenetic and Morphometric Reassessment of the Dental Evidence for a Mesonychian and Cetacean Clade". In Thewissen, J.G.M. (ed.). The Emergence of Whales. Springer. pp. 133–161. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0159-0_5. ISBN 978-1-4899-0159-0.
- ^ Chow, M.M.; Li, C.; Chang, Y. (1973). "Late Eocene mammalian faunas of Honan and Shansi with notes on some vertebrate fossils collected therefrom" (PDF). Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 11 (2): 165–181.
- ^ a b c d Yu, Y.; Gao, H.; Li, Q.; Ni, X. (2023). "A new entelodont (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the late Eocene of China and its phylogenetic implications". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1): 2189436. Bibcode:2023JSPal..2189436Y. doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2189436. S2CID 257895430.
- ^ O'Leary, Maureen A.; Gatesy, John (7 August 2008). "Impact of increased character sampling on the phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia): combined analysis including fossils". Cladistics. 24 (4): 397–442. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00187.x. ISSN 0748-3007. PMID 34879630.
- ^ "PBDB Collection". paleobiodb.org. Retrieved 18 August 2024.
- ^ "PBDB Taxon". paleobiodb.org. Retrieved 10 October 2024.
- ^ Ding, S.Y.; Zheng, J.J.; Zhang, Y.P.; Tong, Y.S. (1977). "The age and characteristics of the vertebrate fauna from Liuniu and Oongjun Formations of the Bose Basin, Zhuang autonomous region". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 15: 35–44.
- ^ a b Qi, T. (1980). "Irdin Manha Upper Eocene and its mammalian fauna at Huhebolhe Cliff in central Inner Mongolia" (PDF). Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 18 (1): 28–32.
- ^ Van Valen, Leigh (1978). "The Beginning of the Age of Mammals" (PDF). Evolutionary Theory. 4: 45–80.
- ^ Zhou, X. (1995). Evolution of Paleocene-Eocene Mesonychidae (Mammalia, Mesonychia) (PhD dissertation). University of Michigan. hdl:2027.42/129581.
- ^ Gingerich, Philip D. (1998), Thewissen, J. G. M. (ed.), "Paleobiological Perspectives on Mesonychia, Archaeoceti, and the Origin of Whales", The Emergence of Whales: Evolutionary Patterns in the Origin of Cetacea, Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 423–449, doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0159-0_15, ISBN 978-1-4899-0159-0, retrieved 16 August 2024
- ^ a b Spaulding, M.; O'Leary, M.A.; Gatesy, J. (2009). "Relationships of Cetacea (Artiodactyla) among mammals: Increased taxon sampling alters interpretations of key fossils and character evolution". PLOS ONE. 4 (9): e7062. Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.7062S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007062. PMC 2740860. PMID 19774069.
- ^ Eronen, Jussi T.; Janis, Christine M.; Chamberlain, Charles Page; Mulch, Andreas (2015). "Mountain uplift explains differences in Palaeogene patterns of mammalian evolution and extinction between North America and Europe". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 282 (1809): 20150136. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0136. PMC 4590438. PMID 26041349.
- ^ Maitre, Elodie (2014). "Western European middle Eocene to early Oligocene Chiroptera: systematics, phylogeny and palaeoecology based on new material from the Quercy (France)". Swiss Journal of Palaeontology. 133 (2): 141–242. Bibcode:2014SwJP..133..141M. doi:10.1007/s13358-014-0069-3. S2CID 84066785.
- ^ a b "PBDB Collection". paleobiodb.org. Retrieved 18 August 2024.
- ^ a b Wang, YuanQing; Meng, Jin; Beard, Christopher K.; Li, Qian; Ni, XiJun; Gebo, Daniel L.; Bai, Bin; Jin, Xun; Li, Ping (1 December 2010). "Early Paleogene stratigraphic sequences, mammalian evolution and its response to environmental changes in Erlian Basin, Inner Mongolia, China". Science China Earth Sciences. 53 (12): 1918–1926. doi:10.1007/s11430-010-4095-8. ISSN 1869-1897.