User talk:DonQuixote
|
||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Warning on a user page
[edit]Hi, I added a level 3 warning template on a user page because they only edits they've ever made have been to remove the same information from a single article on several occasions now. I've only now realised/noticed that you had put a different warning template on earlier today (as yours was headed 'Welcome' I thought it had been added after their first edit; I should've looked at the timestamp, I apologise). I mention this here because I realise Wikipedia policy prevents you from removing my talk page edit, and I thought it would be best to give you the opportunity to ask me to remove my template if you think I've unnecessarily duplicated your warning. best regards, JustAnotherCompanion (talk) 20:58, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. DonQuixote (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Slo-Mo Dredd
[edit]Hello thank you for looking over my changes. I wanted to make a page for SLO-MO as that was necessary in order to add it to a category list of fictional drugs.
The Slo-Mo page itself redirects to Dredd and also features on a SLO-MO disambiguation page.
I agree it’s unlikely to need a full page but in order to feature on the ‘fictional drugs and medicines’ list it needed its own article. Henryryder (talk) 14:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Superman 4
[edit]Do you just don't want people to know it was filmed in Aldwych tube station or something?? Govvy (talk) 16:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- You need to cite a reliable source known for fact-checking. That's literally the minimum requirement. DonQuixote (talk) 16:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- What do you want, take your pick, [1], [2], [3], and it's now your turn to restore the content because I can't break WP:3RR. Govvy (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest you study WP:RS. Here's a hint: which of those has a fact-checking department. It's probably not the tourist companies. DonQuixote (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- You're clearly not here to building wikipedia then it seems, so I will blacklist you from now on. Govvy (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Er...ok?...seriously, WP:RS literally states
Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
Note that they use the same phrase that I usedfact-checking
. If you can't find a source that's renown for fact-checking mentioning this about a widely-known film, then it's probably not notable enough for an encyclopaedia. DonQuixote (talk) 19:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Er...ok?...seriously, WP:RS literally states
- You're clearly not here to building wikipedia then it seems, so I will blacklist you from now on. Govvy (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest you study WP:RS. Here's a hint: which of those has a fact-checking department. It's probably not the tourist companies. DonQuixote (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- What do you want, take your pick, [1], [2], [3], and it's now your turn to restore the content because I can't break WP:3RR. Govvy (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Dark City (film 1997) Revert Edit
[edit]I will reinstate my plot edit to the article on this film. What do you care if the plot summary is "bloated"? Astrophysic66 (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Per WP:FILMPLOT:
Plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words.
DonQuixote (talk) 10:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)