If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.
Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.162.0.41) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Note: please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines, especially before editing any articles related to the United States military or government. Thank you - theWOLFchild22:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This IP address is one of those used by the proxies associated with the US Department of the Navy (incl Marine Corps) via NMCI. As such, there is a very, very large range of people who use this address. It does not excuse whatever happens, it is just here for your information.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hadal 20:28, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hello 138.162.0.41. stumbled on your page List of Naval Officer Designators which needs wikifying & cats. Why not get a screen name? Greetings, J heisenberg 11:41, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page USS Leyte Gulf (CG-55). Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.— Kbh3rdtalk16:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Shadow Kune Do (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot15:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. †Sir James Paul†04:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Dear 138.162.0.41,
Some of your edits on the page
January 19 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.
If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally.
If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 09:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.DougsTech (talk) 13:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Touch Of Light (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Margaret Mitchell, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Since the page already has a title about the person, there is no need for you to make another title with the person's name if it is in the same article. Touch Of Light (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Thanks for experimenting with the page VP-8 on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. —Ed17(Talk / Contribs)19:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your interest in this year's ArbCom elections. Unfortunately, we were required to set a criteria for voters, and that was decided to be the following:
Voters must have a registered account that was created on or before November 1, 2008.
Voters must have made 150 edits to articles on that account on or before November 1, 2008.
According to an automatic check, which I confirmed by looking at your contribution history, you have not met the requirements. Either you have not made 150 edits to articles (these edits must be in the main namespace) or you did not make them before the deadline of 23:59:59 November 1, 2008 (UTC). I've indented your votes. If you believe I sent this message in error, and that you do meet the requirements, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Richmond, Missouri, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Possum Pint (talk) 18:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://superrobotwar.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/srwhotnews_nt6_artcover.jpg). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 09:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Honda Odyssey, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MANdARAX•XAЯAbИAM21:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to English language, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Magic Shell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Nyswimmer (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of Midway, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Glrx (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Music of the United States. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm The Illusive Man. I noticed that you recently removed some content from White flight without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, T.I.M(Contact)20:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. SMC (talk) 15:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you efforts to improve the Oxygen toxicity article. Unfortunately your first edit explaining that the partial pressure of oxygen is 0.21 bar at the surface missed the point of that section, namely that no matter what fraction of oxygen is in the breathing gas, CNS toxicity cannot occur at normal atmospheric pressure.
You're wrong to think that Simon Mitchell's post to RBW is a poor reference. He is an acknowledged and well-published expert on the subject, which makes his post a reliable source. As it happens, I've just got a copy of "Recommendations for rescue of a submerged unresponsive compressed-gas diver" which elaborates on that post and modifies the previous suggestion from Mitchell to give some weight to the earlier fears of AGE. It's a good read and I'd recommend it to you.
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page HSC-22, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to HSC-22 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/Hsc22) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Telephone exchange may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
* [http://www.co-buildings.com/ Telephone Central Office Building Pictures (even more Central Office
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Kudpung can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. –72(talk)16:49, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm VibeScepter. I noticed that you recently removed content from DeWitt Weaver (golfer) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 18:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm LauritzT. Your recent edit(s) to the page Juxtaposition appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 12:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Dmehus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Washington Post, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can reply to this message on this talk page. While I agree that The Washington Post does, indeed, have a leftist bias, the fact is, in order to introduce that statement in to the article, it needs to be cited. Thus, I have reverted your good faith edit without prejudice to re-introduction in the future, provided it is fully cited. Thanks.Doug Mehus (talk) 20:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Dmehus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Whistling have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. I don't know whether E9 or C9 as a musical note is correct, but the "and 8 cents" seems like obvious vandalism, which you are advised to avoid.Doug Mehus (talk) 21:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you recently removed content from New jack swing without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
@BradV:. Thanks, see you in a month! Just so you know Brad, as every reasonable person knows, the only reason I am not a positive editor is because of the block and the only reason the block exists is to prevent me from editing. So, the logical thing to do would be to lift the block so I can go back to doing thousands of edits a week of improvements. Otherwise, these bans, blocks and methods of preventing me from improving Wikipedia because I advocated admins should have to follow the rules are going to be self perpetuating. I will not stop fighting my BS, invalid ban! Not ever! So if you all want to put an end to this pointless fighting, lift the ban so I can get back to editing. I know you have no intention of doing that, because you really don't care about improving Wikipedia as much as controlling it, but I wanted to throw it out there. Because you and you're peers are the only reason Wikipedia has me listed as an enemy instead of an asset. So all you need to do to get a high output editor back is lift the ban. PS, just so you know, I really can edit whenever I want. 138.162.0.41 (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Hello, 138.162.0.41. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Daonguyen95 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
