Talk:Papal apartments

European Microstates: Vatican City Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vatican City portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as High-importance).

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

I have never ever seen the Papal Apartments written in the singular, always in the plural. FearÉIREANN^(talk) 23:03, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from main article - unsourced. --Neutrality^talk 06:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--The rooms were originally highly decorated with rich ornate furnishings. However, following the Second Vatican Council, Pope Paul VI (who as a young bishop had once suggested that popes should live in more modest rooms in the Lateran Palace, away from the Roman Curia, the papal court) had the private rooms in the Vatican Apartments stripped of all ornate decor, preferring what he viewed as a form of monastic simplicity. He also redesigned the private chapel. However, the latter redesign was criticized in some quarters, as excessively representative of architectural styles fashionable in the 1970s but which are no longer popular or liked.

Photos

Could someone find a number of photos for this article? I think it needs a gallery section of some sort, with a couple placed in the article. Pictures of the pope blessing crowds from the loggia, the kitchen, private living area, the pope's library... I understand some areas are restricted and private, but surely some parts of the Apartments have been photographed. --Pstanton (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) – Ammarpad (talk) 16:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papal Apartments → Papal apartments – Plain noun, after all. PPEMES (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose. Does appear to be some sort of proper name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support RS don't seem to capitalize (at least the ones used as references in the article). Not clear why the article prose uses capitalization - just an oversight, I would think. Colin M (talk) 00:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support, absent clear evidence (which is lacking) that this is indeed a proper noun. bd2412 T 16:21, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article incorrect on it supposedly ceasing to function as a papal palace

I have removed the false claim that it would cease to function as a papal palace and function as a museum. NO evidence found to back that up, and ALL evidence contradicts it. They simply say that the papal apartment would be open to the public as Pope Francis is not using it as a residence. Even the link provided in the paragraph didn't say what the paragraph said and in fact contradicted it. It is still a papal residence with a papal apartment. It is simply that the current pope doesn't use it and has decided to open it up to the public. It is still the official summer residence of the pope, and the next pope could use it if they wish, or Francis could change his mind. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 02:06, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]