Tri-Cities (Tennessee) - author blanked it, someone say something if they want it kept. Dori | Talk 06:33, Jan 21, 2004 (UTC)
No particular desire to keep. But open to discussion. SpellBott 13:45, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
The author has the ethical right to ask us to delete the article if this is his/her desire. Delete. Optim 05:04, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
The author has the ethical right to ask us for the moon! But we have the ethical and legal right to keep it on, as a matter of arbitrary policy if we find that policy convenient. For non-arbitrary (and IMO ethical) policy reasons having in part to do with their desire to hide something they said they wanted our help publicizing, we should, whenever submitter requests deletion and copyvio is not an issue:
Keep a permanent copy off-line
Delete from server only if a cogent and plausible reason is given
Refuse deletion from server and investigate further, despite such reasons, if a non-far-fetched scenario suggests potential harm from deletion
Keep, to avoid impression of a precedent for easy retraction --Jerzy 05:27, 2004 Jan 26 (UTC)
I personally think that this should be deleted in any case, or at least de-stubbified. Ilyanep 22:23, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)
No-one has suggested a reason for deletion, so keep. Perhaps when someone has thought of a reason why the content shouldn't be here, it can be listed again. -- Oliver P. 02:18, 26 Jan 2004 (UTC)
