Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Szmuness

Conspiracy theories ya us. RickK 04:41, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)

• The article is problematic, but not a candidate for deletion IMHO. The person was noteworthy, and the fact of the conjecture about him is interesting. Needs careful editing, but keep. --Woggly 05:10, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Keep the introductory paragraph (thank you Catherine), and trash the rest. Google gives 367 hits for his name. Of the original article, the only notable part of his history is in the last three paragraphs. Those statements are extremely questionable. I am not in favor of an article describing an obscure conspiracy theory. Delete the original content, but keep the intro so that a real article can grow from it. SWAdair | Talk 06:25, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, and keep the background details as well unless there is cause to think they are false. Work on POV as necessary. Everyking 08:02, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: On cleanup, I and others are trying to make it acceptable and NPOV. It might be possible to report the conspiracy theory without endorsing it, and even to offer a few countering phrases without engaging in polemics. Geogre 13:30, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)