User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61474 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64825 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Racklinspaceprogram (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1086 three times in the last 5 minutes (Disruptive edit summaries, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- CuteRobot4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 100.14.131.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1014:B100:6AC1:0:56:DA88:6701 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Article talk page PA and removal of sourced content – IP data and editing patterns tell me this is almost certainly a sock of Lokicat3345. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ausernamea (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Gary4rfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- WikiProCreate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – The username suggests that this user might be involved in paid editing. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Their behaviour and argument feels very much like paid editing. They are far too concerned about their reputation. It's certainly nothing to do with the software ProCreate, this is a paid writer. Secretlondon (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated budget vandalism. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked blocked by HJ Mitchell. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- List of equipment of the People's Liberation Army Ground Force (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued unsourced/disruptive editing by dynamic IPs. Loafiewa (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: 3 IPs have vandalized the page within the last few hours. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I want indefinite semi-protection 2600:100C:B0AA:D2E1:C883:EEE3:6CE5:81FB (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism related to the release date from an IP user. Sussywidget (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from lots of IPs from article’s entire history; likely a constant target. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:65DB:CB9F:8589:443 (talk) 21:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly every edit on this page has been vandalism, pending changes doesn't seem to be working here. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – We need indefinite page protection here. An anonymous IP editor has been vandalizing this page from its very beginning. They have removed sourced content in the past, added unsourced material, and so on. I tried to stabilize the situation before, eventually asking for page protection. The page was protected, but in the end, they prevailed. As soon as the protection was lifted, they came back and restored everything to their unsourced version. For almost three years, they have had complete control. They are still active now. It seems to be a single individual as far as I can tell. What's the point of anything then? I think IP editing should be permanently restricted on this page. This is the last time I will invest any of my time trying to bring the article up to Wikipedia's standards. Thank you. Mosesheron (talk) 22:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – After a block of a Russian speaking user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Quebite they editing logged out with a Russian ip. Shadow4dark (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that... (Please consider reversing the recent revision made by the User:Gokul BM. The change in range was made without supporting sources, which has affected the accuracy of the ranking.https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147282&oldid=1246147073&variant=en https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_South_Indian_films&diff=1246147073&oldid=1246002411&variant=en) . W170924 (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I don't see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table, so there is no reason to believe that the previous version was more correct than the current version. If you have an issue with a recent edit, then discuss it with that editor. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist Also, I don’t understand what you meant by 'I don’t see any supporting sources given for any of those numbers in the entire table,' as the Highest-grossing films table is properly sourced except for the entries manipulated by this user. Am I wrong? Did I miss anything? W170924 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Anachronist Pardon me, but to be specific, the ranges changed as follows:
Varisu: ₹290–293 to ₹290–310
Kabali: ₹284–305 to ₹284–499
Beast: ₹227–240 to ₹217–300
Mersal: ₹220 to ₹200–260
Note that before the change, the figures were supported by the references provided in the corresponding ref fields. The new ranges, however, contradict the references because the user did not provide any sources to back their claim. Why is there no consideration of this discrepancy?W170924 (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
In the subsection of the section "Non-jewish support" titled "Muslim support", it is stated that Al-Jamāʻah al-islāmīyah is considered a terrorist organization by the US. The US no longer considers Al-Jamāʻah al-islāmīyah a terrorist organisation since 2022. This can be replaced by stating that it is considered a terrorist organization by the UK. Guessbuckets (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. That isn't what the cited source says (which appears to be out of date). Please specify exactly what the text should say, and what source it should cite. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK, sorry about that.
- Replace
- "an Islamist militant group that is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and European Union,"
- (Removing the source as well; it's outdated.)
- with
- "an Islamist militant group that is designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and United Kingdom,"
- and adding the sources
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/2056/oj (for the EU)
- and
- https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proscribed-terror-groups-or-organisations--2/proscribed-terrorist-groups-or-organisations-accessible-version#list-of-proscribed-international-terrorist-groups (for the UK)
- The two sources I added are up to date. The one source listed in the current version is out of date, and the current version also states that the US considers it a terrorist org which is both unsourced and no longer the case.
- Thanks! Guessbuckets (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Photo of former president Donald Trump is outdated. Same photo as from 2016 election page. Replace with current photo from 2024 likeness. 169.252.4.21 (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- We are limited to whatever freely-licenced images are available, as Trump is still alive. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 18 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for accountcreator |
|---|
Account creator[edit]
|
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Been on Wikipedia for a few years now. Mainly created BLPs. Requesting for autopatrolled rights to reduce the backlog of new page patrollers. I declare that I've understood verifiability, notability and copyrights. SerChevalerie (talk) 21:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Created 407 articles, and only 2 were deleted—1 was soft deleted earlier in 2022, and the latest one was deleted per WP:A10, which is not a major issue. 99.5% or 405 of his articles are still live. I came across him while patrolling New Pages. I believe he is one of the users for whom this right was created. GrabUp - Talk 17:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Has created 380 articles, of which only 4 have been deleted. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 00:23, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access for updating census data of highly populated Indian villages in Kerala state and other human settlements on this planet in future. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like access to AWB to fix CheckWiki issues more efficiently than I currently do using WPCleaner. I also want to streamline typo fixing as part of WP:TYPO. I understand I have been denied it twice in the recent past, but I strongly believe that I am fit for getting the permission now, as I gained significantly more experience and done more constructive edits. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to use AWB's Checkwiki functionality to alter position of references with respect to punctuation and incorrect ISBNs as I am frequently revising pages that need reference issue support; use find and replace for music album title issues; and use AWB for assistance on creating and correcting items and links within categories of music genres, domestic flag information, and public parks. Thank you. Shotgunheist 💬 19:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Improve articles' layouts, correcting Spanish settlement infoboxes, changing IPA-va (depricated) to IPA|ca-valencia, adding IPA, correcting links, etc. I had AWB rights in the past, however I stopped using Wikipedia due to COVID-19. Now I am fully recovered and would like to carry on improving things here and there. Thank you. Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC) Nuvolet (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Requesting access to clean up a relatively long list of redirects that were left after a page move. RachelTensions (talk) 13:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Can i please have extended confirmed rights back. I lost it because one day when i had a little less than 500 edits, i made about 45-55 edits in one hour in order to get to 500 edits. Im new to this site and didn't know gaming edits was against the rules. Ever since i lost the extended confirmed thing, I've made hundreds of edits i think are constructive and i stopped vandalism a few times and have a much better understanding of the rules. extended confirmed rights HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 21:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I want to be able to branch out and explore different aspects of Wikipedia, as article creation does tend to get boring nowadays. I have made 340 pages, 4 of which were deleted (all 4 were from June or earlier). I have no track record of incivility that I am aware of besides a heated conflict back in April, and am a host at the Teahouse. I have commented or voted on ~45 AfDs, and have sent several of my articles through AfC, and I know how the policies work there. If possible, I'd also like to request just a 1-month trial, as I want to see what the tool is like before I commit to it. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 16:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am interested in helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and i think now I'm experienced in AFD, AFC and draftifications. Xegma(talk) 20:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have some experience in AfC and NPP that I believe would help me. {{The Sharpest Lives|💬|✏️|ℹ️}} 04:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I currently have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days and would like to continue patrolling new pages to help bring down the huge backlog. Ednabrenze (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing general maintenance tasks for a while now (despite some breaks in activity), and I would like the opportunity to further expand my skill set and help reduce the backlog of pages. Thanks! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 17:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I have some experience creating article and so far, I have been guiding new users to edit Wikipedia as well as reviewing their drafts. I will like to request the new page reviewer following my understanding of how it works (This took a while for me, however I am very good now following several trainings). Looking forward to my request been granted!. Tesleemah (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I was hoping to participate in the NPP Sep. backlog drive, since I missed the last one. I have some article writing experience, and regularly interact with newcomers during RC patrolling. I also have a decent AfD nomination ratio, with the same being true of my CSD log. Overall, I think I would make a useful addition to the NPP team, and hope to be trusted with this responsibility. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Besides a few articles and redirects that I sometimes create, I often help others with improving and reviewing their drafts and newly created articles. If I could then mark the articles as reviewed and use the other review tools, this work would be even more effective. Thanks. Killarnee (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello! I recently applied for rollback and withdrew my request after realizing that I was below the required 200 main space edit count. Now, I have 206 main space edits (mostly anti-vandalism work) as well as a month of experience. I would like access to rollback in order to use tools like Huggle and Anti-Vandal to revert vandalism more quickly. During my very first efforts to revert vandalism, I did fail to warn some users as I did not have access to RedWarn or Twinkle and had not yet read the related policies. Shortly after that, I read WP:VANDAL. Now, I believe I have since built a strong track record of warning the user every time I revert their edits and reverting only when appropriate. Thanks! TryAgainSooner (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello hello, I have been a strongly active and, I believe, positive contributor to Wikipedia for over 4 months now, and have throughly enjoyed my time editing and undoing vandalism/unconstructive edits whenever I see them. I have not reverted a *ton* of vandalism, but I do believe that I have at least demonstrated by ability to discern and do so, as well as doing my best as of recently to notify users when I revert their edits. Moreover, I commit to using this right fairly, constructively, and honestly if given it. Thanks Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been cleaning up vandalism mostly with the help of Twinkle. I was granted temporary rollback rights in 2021 but then life got busy and I didn't seek an extension. I now have more time to dedicate to counter-vandalism efforts again. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 13:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I'm requesting for permissions because I know it will save a lot of time my time to undo problematic edits. I have read the guidelines for how and when to use rollback so yes am ready. Cheers
Hello! I have been guiding new users against Vandalism for a while now and this is done mostly offline.however,recently my passion for more onwiki contribution grew and I signed up as a host on Wikipedia Teahouse where I have been guiding new editors, I will like to request the right to roll back edit in order to do more of onwiki tasks and ease the work of admins. Tesleemah (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have rollback because vandalism on wikipedia is always high and it is important to have people looking out for potential vandals, and lower this. I will not give mercy unless it is a good faith edit and will make sure to always warn users, as I am doing right now with the help of Ultraviolet. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 14:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have over 800 edits, most of which are on the main space. I am aware I have a somewhat lousy history with giving proper edit summaries, as i didn't fill out revision summaries, but I have tried to rectify it. I was also involved in a dispute which might have been classified as an edit war back in April. Other then that I have a clean slate. Thanks for considering. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
|
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [12] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
