Talk:Down on the Upside
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Down on the Upside article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Down on the Upside has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Reviews
[edit]What should be done about the reviews down the bottom of the page? I am tempted just to delete them as there are reviews in the infobox, but im looking for a second opinion on this one.Grover 10:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Language Ambiguity
[edit]There is some ambiguity at the end of the the first paragraph:
"...sales quickly waned and it failed to match the popularity of predecessor Superunknown. Likewise, in 1996 fellow Seattle grunge rockers Alice in Chains released their last studio album with no major tour, and Pearl Jam's popularity suffered from the release of the idiosyncratic No Code."
It is ambiguous whether Soundgarden did a major tour either (which I am pretty sure they did). Also, the last bit about "No Code" also seems a bit vague.
--Whiteskittlz 03:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whiteskittlz (talk • contribs) 03:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
- Furthermore, AIC's self titled album came out in 95, not 96.65.43.214.58 12:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
"End of grunge" section re-added
[edit]I don't know why that was removed, it shows that this was one of the last significant albums released during that era. It is widely agreed upon that 1996 was the last major year for the "grunge" craze, by 1998 the whole thing fizzled out in the mainstream, and I think the section should stay there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.172.234 (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Personnel section
[edit]As the personnel section is so cluttered, I feel that columns are necessary for clarity purposes. Darwin's Bulldog (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I would rather go by Wikipedia policy for this. I'm awaiting clarification for what that is.-5- (talk) 04:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Deadlinks
[edit]There are two deadlinks that I found that I couldn't find an archived copy on web.archive.org or that don't go to where they should go:
- http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=305&cfgn=Albums&cfn=The+Billboard+200&ci=3023602&cdi=7067011&cid=06%2F08%2F1996 (ref #25)
- http://www.mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum (ref #60)
–MuZemike 22:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Down on the Upside/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
![]()
|
Last edited at 15:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 13:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Down on the Upside page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Down on the Upside" page.