Jump to content

Talk:14:59

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Whoever wrote the synopsis for this album clearly was not aware of the two Sugar Ray albums that preceded this. They said that "New Direction" was a heavy metal track atypical of Sugar Ray. No, Sugar Ray were, up until this album, strictly a hard rock band. This track is VERY typical of Sugar Ray up until this point. An objective reviewer would have pointed out that the REST of the album is in fact atypical of Sugar Ray, but would come to be the style they were known for and pursued from this point on. "Fly" was the only song on the last album that wasn't hard rock, and since it became a hit, Sugar Ray toned down their style to suit a more pop-rock radio audience.

-koval-

That writeup's pretty embarrassingly journalistic. I tagged it for cleanup ages ago...guess I should just do it myself, one of these days...Chubbles 06:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "atypical" bit was changed to "typical." Except for the two sentences that need citations (which can probably be deleted altogether), I think the article is pretty cleaned up. ChagrinRiddle 19:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 14:59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]