Talk:Bibracte

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / European / French / Classical Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Mid‑importance

	Bibracte is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gaul Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gaul, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gaul on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaulWikipedia:WikiProject GaulTemplate:WikiProject GaulGaul articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland

[[Category:History of Switzerland]] is dubious; just because the Helvetii wound up giving their name to the Latin name of the modern Switzerland doesn't make this Swiss history. Bibracte is a couple hundred kilometers from modern Switzerland, too, in the heart of France. Maybe the original +cat person has their reasons, though, so I haven't touched it. — Bill 10:52, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, I have my reasons. The Helvetii settled in what is today the western part of Switzerland. The Battle at Bibracte was an important event in the history of the people living on the territory now know as Switzerland, even if it happened outside the boundaries of that modern-day state. But so did the Battle of Marignano, which had profound effects on the history of Switzerland in 1515. Lupo 21:18, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I'm sorry to have to say that The Oppidum the Bibracte is absolutely not in Switzerland. It is in France, 5 km from St. Leger s/s Beuvray and 20 km from Autun. Have a look at this page: Oppidum. P.S. I know for sure since I spend quite some summers in that region of Burgundy!. Golf

Disputed text re:pagan Christ

I also have to say that the piece of text in the link section is not that good at all. The site housed at the max 10.000 people and was indeed a centre of power and culture for the intire region. Cesar himself sad that he never encountered a more civilized centre of people in that part of the world. But to state that it was infect destroyed by a mob 300 years after it’s abandonment and subsequent decay it just a bit to much nonsense for my taste. There was infect a Christian Monastery with a brotherhood of monks on the same site after the abandonment by the Gaul’s that did have some troubles with the locals and was party burned down. But guy’s lets put some fact checking into this article! Next time I’m there I’ll see about getting some extra info from the Museum (That’s the one on site…). There should be some good info to get from there and if I have some time I’ll take some photo’s too… Golf

I have deleted this text which,while referenced,references a book which is patent nonsense and conflicts with known historical fact. its here in case anyone wants to pick over it.

The following text should be checked, wikified, and incorporated into the above article.

Bibracte was an important locus of pre-Christian Gaelic civilisation. According to Harper, Tom; The Pagan Christ; Thomas Allen Publishers, Toronto. 2004,p.61 (see also Alvin Boyd Kuhn,The Lost Light: An Interpretation of Ancient Scriptures, 1940.Reprint, Kessinger Publishing,1997), Bibracte had a Druid College of forty thousand students which offered studies in Phil., astrology, architecture, law, medicine, grammar, literature, and esoteric religion. It was destroyed in 389 by a mob of Christians. This type of destruction--of books, cities, monasteries, and temples was also carried out in Arles (seat of learning for two thousand years, sacked by Christians in 270,and in Alesia. It is this destruction, like the colossal destruction of the Library of Alexandria by Christian monks in the fifth century, that makes some history vague and nebulous, and in the cases of Bibracte, Arles, and Alesia, it leaves us confounded in this day by Stonehenge.

Golf, the museum is great, you should make sure not to miss it. --Nantonos 10:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Plans

I plan to greatly improve this article - I have been there twice, have a bunch of books on the subject, may upload some photos. However, I probably won't be able to do that before the weekend of the 15th Oct 2005. --Nantonos 11:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bibracte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150630081856/http://www.bibracte.fr/fr/decouvrez/archeologie/campagne-2008_02_04_04.html to http://www.bibracte.fr/fr/decouvrez/archeologie/campagne-2008_02_04_04.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bibracte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://liris.cnrs.fr/publis/pdf/Calabretto-2003_liris996.pdf?id=996
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bibracte.fr/index.php?langue=en
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303093229/http://www.bibracte.fr/en/ to http://www.bibracte.fr/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History of the oppidum

The section says that the oppidum is of the 3rd century, can anyone check the linked source? While it's possible that the fortifications were posterior I suspect the date should be 3rd century BC, since the village is supposed to be already significant during the wars with the Romans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.43.203.12 (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]