Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilian tradition
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 05:09, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
This stuff appears to be totally bogus. Gets pretty much no google hits other than Wikipedia and mirrors. Therefore, it's not notab--no, wait, instead of "not notable", I meant to say "original research".
Anyway, one of the top hits is about a Lilian tradition of fashion, so even if we keep this thing, we'd have to move it and make a disambiguation page. Let's just delete it instead. - Nat Krause 18:22, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Mcfly85 22:38, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Iff (if and only if) more information can be found on the Lilian tradition. --129.180.1.124 00:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 06:47, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- ?Delete unless verified ? --Simon Cursitor 06:52, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, NN. Radiant_* 08:34, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -Sean Curtin 01:27, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.