Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024_September_7


September 7

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

Category:Stinkers Bad Movie Award winning films

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not a defining award Mason (talk) 21:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Don Young

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Practically everything in each of these categories is not "defined" by the politician, and are better served as just being interlinked. The bulk of each page are just the elections they were in or a thing named after the person. They're all made by the same category creator. Mason (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Category:California winemakers

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to parent category. I understand that California has the most vineyards but I don't think we should defuse by state because of that. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:19th-century Kongo people

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one person across both of these centuries. I don't think that the Kongo people category tree is large enough to need diffusion by century Mason (talk) 17:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suicides by carbon monoxide poisoning in Japan

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Another WP:XY redirect which should be deleted. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Land disputes by country

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There are only two countries in here (and they're barely populated), which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oils and fats technologies

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Narrow itersection category with only one page in it. Mason (talk) 12:07, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chemical looping technologies

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There are one two pages in this category, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 12:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lighthouses completed in the 2nd century

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: rename and re-parent, one of the two lighthouses was completed in the 3rd century BC rather than in the 2nd century CE. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:56, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great suggestion! Support per nom Mason (talk) 12:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medieval canals

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: merge, these are all one- or two-article categories, this is not helpful for navigation. The 15th-century has only one merge target because the two articles are already in decade categories of transport infrastructure. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archival technology

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 02:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Retailers

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: The term "Retailers" is too ambiguous; when I first saw it in Category:Retailing I assumed it was referring to people. But then I discovered that most of the subcats are for Retail companies. Thank goodness the editors who created those subcats had the good sense to use that term rather than "Retailers", so I don't think any of the subcats are in need of renaming. :) Anomalous+0 (talk) 01:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Numbers not in Wikidata

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: To move where the articles have been recategorized to via the {{Cite The Numbers}} temp. Consistency with Category:The Numbers ID different from Wikidata. Trailblazer101 (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy redirect. There's no need to discuss this, especially since the proposed target "rename" already exists as a category, meaning the only thing that needs to happen is a categoryredirect. Bearcat (talk) 13:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The rename has already taken place in the template; should we keep a redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]