Talk:Murney Tower

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Military history: Canadian / North America C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Errors

Hi, just correct a couple of errors:

The current Fort Henry was built between 1932-37 and two flanking Martello Towers were added in 1846.
Murney Tower, Cathcart Tower, Shoal Tower and Fort Frontenac were built between 1846-47 and are standalone redoubts (Murney Tower is in fact on a different river bank several miles away from Fort Henry.)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.145.13.99 (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Frontenac is not a Martello Tower. Fort Frontenac is a French Fort and trading post established in 1673 and captured by the British in 1758. It was replaced after the war of 1812 with the Tete-de-Pont barracks, which is what bears the current name.

Murney tower is indeed part of the defenses of Kingston, as are Cathcart and Shoal, and I think it would be an unreasonable stretch to say that their distance from the fort excludes them from being considered part of its network of defenses. It has always been my understanding that that was entirely the point of constructing them (and along such similar architectural lines).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.219.52 (talk) 07:53, 6 February 2005 (UTC)[reply]