User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- Whynotwhynottt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 21:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Varcriminal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalism-only account. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Scorpy corporation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CuteAngerManagement (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Ghostieisdumb (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "(is|was|are|were) ?(a|the)? ?dumb" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Crimeaddicts222 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "crime" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Directsmelly (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "smell(y|s)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Wiki is promoting propaganda (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. I wasn't sure about reporting this as they haven't edited as yet. I apologise if I'm too quick off the mark. Knitsey (talk) 15:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Unkownsolidier, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: He is a contentious topic thus this article is vulnerable to a lot of unsourced speculation sillygirly97 (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 17:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent rash of IP editing to add claims that article subject promotes slavery. Example from 24 July: <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kinjil_Mathur&diff=1236456394&oldid=1236455520>. Geoff | Who, me? 21:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Racist vandalism Kowal2701 (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: insufficient vandalism to justify an increase to ECP (page is already semi'd). Elli (talk | contribs) 22:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article covers an obviously highly controversial topic. The talk page even has a Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement template yet the article itself has no protection. ―Howard • 🌽33 21:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:ARBPIA 69.118.230.235 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe IP address vandalism and BLP violation. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 21:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IPs to remove content that doesn't paint the college in a postive light. This has been going on for quite a while, see Talk:Bryant_&_Stratton_College/Archive_2#For-profit_status. IP has stated they will continue edit warring here. This article has been semi-protected several times before due to SPA activity, most recently in Jan 2023 for 3 months. MrOllie (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: I have misused the name of this page by people who like to create pages they have nothing to do with, without understanding anything about the rules of free Wikipedia, we ask that the barrier "This page is now protected" be removed and we cooperate with people who Expert Wikipedia creator. We strongly request that our proposal be accepted. 192.145.175.192 (talk) 07:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Who are 'we'? An organisation of some kind? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note, it's been a socky topic according to the AFD last month. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Previously deleted attempts at creating this article are adequate reason for protection. Furthermore, the OP belongs to a range that has been mentioned in WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Abdiaziizho. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page protection is not necessary here because this is an ongoing lawsuit and one side is attempting to make fact of ongoing proceedings in a biased manner. This needs to be removed so that actual fact can be cited through court rulings. Barbeach23 (talk) 15:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
- We don't cite court rulings here (gov't document). We would need to cite newspapers that report about those rulings. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
+1 Reason: There is no need to protect this page. Changes are being made to the page by one of the parties to the ongoing lawsuit that are advantageous and biased. These modifications need to be removed and that cannot be done while the page is protected. Barbeach23 (talk) 19:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Declined Did you ask Lectonar, who just protected it today? I think a one-week protection is appropriate and you can discuss changes on the talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I wish to contest the following line in the article: "Cheatle also acknowledged that the Secret Service had rebuffed requests for additional resources for Trump's security detail in the two years leading up to the assassination attempt." First, this line has no footnotes to reference it's origin. Looking through the sites linked in the footnotes previous to this line and the line following it, nothing indicates the veracity of that statement. Instead, one can see lawmakers trying to infer this conclusion during her Congressional testimony regarding the attempted assassination of former President Trump, while she denies it. 2601:547:CA01:3C4E:8BC:6A39:2650:79D4 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Done I have reworded those sentences to conform with the sources. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:30, 24 July 2024 (UTC) |
18 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
---|
Account creator[edit] |
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to Wikipedia for some time now and have made numerous constructive edits, focusing mainly on Global South topics. I believe that having autopatrolled rights would help streamline my contributions by reducing the workload for the reviewing editors and ensuring quicker article updates. I have read and understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those on notability and reliable sourcing. I am committed to maintaining high standards of content quality and adhering to community norms. If you could consider granting me autopatrolled rights, I would greatly appreciate your consideration. Thanks. 12eeWikiUser (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 12eeWikiUser (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Applying for the right as my edits were rationale. I have undergone all the criterions and I fit in all. I am well aware about Star Missispi and Joe Roe's earlier declines, but now I am fully washed and proved myself eligible for the right. From AFD/CSD to AfC reviews, and developing a handful of drafts for acceptance, I can now proudly say that I am eligible for the role. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser for making otherwise-tedious edits to replace widely-used raster images with vectorized equivalents. ⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Would be useful to make tedious edits. Un assiolo (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I want to use the tool for making semi-automated edits such as fixing typos, sorting lists, and working with its other features. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 17:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights:
|
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
Requests for file mover |
---|
File mover[edit]
I would like to apply for the File mover right to rename files. I've been contributing on Commons for quite some time now, and I've been doing lots of good file renaming requests on Wikipedia. The file movers also appreciated my rename requests [5]. I'm a file mover and patroller on Commons, and I've moved over 1000 files so far. I have a good understanding of the renaming guideline, and I think it would be really helpful also having the right here. Thank you! Waqar💬 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to help out with NPP considering the backlog, and now that I've created a few articles I feel like I'm ready. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 18:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)\
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights As an experienced Wiki editor, I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help maintain the quality and accuracy of new pages. Your approval would allow me to contribute more effectively to wiki community. SparrowQ (talk) 18:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I've had previous experience, had it on trial period for a month during the back-drive, and I feel like I can especially do more. Noorullah (talk) 11:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I actively edit article and patrol "recent changes" to fight vandalism using ultraviolet and twinkle, I also created and help expanding a few articles. I notice that very high backlog and want to help with that. I want to help with Philippine related, Anime related, and Japan related articles. Thanks. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been requested by a user to review his articles: User talk:Mika1h#Game engine coverage. Might as well review some other articles too but I don't plan to do it long-term. Mika1h (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Requesting extension of new page reviewer permission following three-month trial. Have enjoyed the work and would like to continue. Posting now since I will be off the grid for early August when the current perm expires. (Courtesy ping to Clovermoss who granted the trial.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Applying for a trial period to show my ability as well as to reduce the backlog. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I would like to review some pages—particularly within Wikiprojects SCOTUS and Law. Also, I sometimes help autopatrolled users move drafts to mainspace over existing redirects via WP:RM/TR, and would like to be able to mark those as reviewed. (E.g., this one is yet to be reviewed.) SilverLocust 💬 21:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting page mover rights to help close discussions at WP:RM, if a consensus is clear. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 03:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
I am a registered user with more than 6 months of experience and more than 3000 edits, I moved a lot of pages and have created the Requested move for the page Danilo Guades. (I also don't have blocks).
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing. Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting pending changes review rights to improve my anti-vandalism work here on Wikipedia. I frequently revert instances of vandalism and am willing to assist with pending changes revisions. Thank you. — doclys (❀) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I think I could review pending changes every now and then while I'm doing antivandalism patrolling. I've not been as active recently as I wish I was, but I think I can help in some little ways. The Night Watch (talk) 10:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello! I am applying for the role of rollbacker, having been a Wikipedia user for over 10 years and being increasingly active in the last few years. In this vein, I feel that I have undone my fair share of vandalism and, being mainly focused on football/sports articles, vandalism and unconstructive/unsourced edits are very common in my area of interest and editing. I believe that these rights will be very useful in maximising the efficiency of my work on Wikipedia and will save me time from undoing separate edits individually. Additionally, I have past experience as an administrator on a Wikia project, where I made use of the rollback feature and have good knowledge of its positives and when to utilise it. Thank you for taking your time to review my request. Kind regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I regularly monitor the "recent change" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to quickly enhance the process of reviewing RecentChanges. For over a month, I have been patrolling RecentChanges and using Ultraviolet and Twinkle to revert and warn users. Thank you. — doclys (❀) 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 124 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 11 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 472 |
Templates for deletion | 186 |
Categories for deletion | 163 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 20 |
All redirects for discussion | 269 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 36 |
Possible copyright violations | 31 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 130 |
All files proposed for deletion | 6 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 7 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 380 |
Unknown copyright status | 42 |
Unknown source | 21 |
No non-free use rationale | 3 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 8 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,219 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 443 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,558 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,364 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 5,760 | 0.08 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,297 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 38,622 | 0.56 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 10,812 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 521,855 | 7.61 |
All articles lacking sources | 86,532 | 1.26 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 793 | 0.07 |
All articles needing additional references | 460,075 | 6.71 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,384 | 0.06 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 104,814 | 1.53 |
All articles with dead external links | 300,709 | 4.39 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 138 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 21 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,843 | 0.03 |
All articles to be split | 795 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
Stub categories | 19,215 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 771 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 56,627 | 0.83 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,933 | 0.04 |
All articles with style issues | 19,544 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,736 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,550 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 236 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,628 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,692 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,140 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/4e/Hknight_small.jpg/800px-Hknight_small.jpg)
Misc
[edit]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |