This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
In God We Trust is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT3:...that "In God We Trust" appeared as a motto the first time in 1748 in Pennsylvania, that it was first struck on U.S. currency on a 2¢ piece in 1864 and that since 1955, the motto must appear on all U.S. currency? Source: per above
Overall: Szmenderowiecki , hooks are great, I personally prefer ALT1. And what do you think of this one? It would be mix of hook 1 and 2 and is below the 200 characters without bold and wls. ... that "In God We Trust" appeared as a motto the first time in 1748 in Pennsylvania, is displayed on coins of the United States since 1864 and as of 1955 the motto must appear on all U.S. currency?
"As of" sounds as if it were a requirement in 1955 but now we aren't sure whether it's still a requirement 65 years later (it is still law).
My version: ALT1+2: ...that "In God We Trust" appeared as a motto the first time in 1748 in Pennsylvania, that it was first struck on U.S. currency on a 2¢ piece in 1864 and that since 1955, the motto must appear on all U.S. currency? (192 characters)
Perhaps the citation (35) is correct and Walter Breen erroneously wrote that Chase drew inspiration from his alma mater, Brown University. I do not believe Chase ever attended Brown. I believe he attended Dartmouth, which has a much different motto. 2600:1000:B027:67FF:1440:BE3D:D723:1BA6 (talk) 00:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of all the stupid shit you keep doing here, this is one of the most innane. We do not wikilink common words, and doing the same with Wiktionary is just as stupid.
Do you realize that if you accidentally make a good edit it will likely get reverted because your track record shows nothing you do can be trusted? What's sad about this is that you are obviously intelligent, very experienced here, and know the ropes quite well, yet you're just screwing around. If you seriously think you're improving things, then you need help, because you are delusional. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]